But a nice sentiment, nonetheless.
Remember if people talk behind your back, it only means you are two steps ahead.
-- Fannie Flagg
But a nice sentiment, nonetheless.
Remember if people talk behind your back, it only means you are two steps ahead.
-- Fannie Flagg
Pretty fascinating article about work done by a Columbia professor named Carl Hart, and a book he has recently published.
It'd be great to hear him interviewed by Mark Kleiman.
Not even a shorter. An actual quote:
Oh, Peggy’s reaching for her martini shaker again.
Maybe it grates on him [Vladimir Putin] that in his time some of the stupider Americans have crowed about American exceptionalism a bit too much ...
Unpossible!
__________
Bonus fun fact: Firefox's spell-checker simply does not recognize exceptionalism.
Communists.
I realize my lack of ruthlessness goes to the heart of the liberal dilemma.
-- Roy Edroso
Dilemmas are hard.
Oh my word. You must put off for three minutes whatever it is you were going to do next and read Roy's UPDATE under his latest announcement post.
You will never truly understand wingnuts until you realize how deeply they believe in Obama's seekrit majicull powerz.
(You will actually never truly understand wingnuts. Unpossible.)
Click the pic to see the caption more clearly.
__________
Not shown above: Geno Smith
__________
Oh, wait. There he is!
Ajit Pai, the lone Republican on the Federal Communications Commission, is on a personal if quixotic quest to save AM. After a little more than a year in the job, he is urging the F.C.C. to undertake an overhaul of AM radio, which he calls “the audible core of our national culture.”
Being fair and balanced Objective™, the NYT makes you click through to page two before the eight hundred pound pilonidal cyst
is perfunctorily disclaimed:
Mr. Pai said he was not promoting AM to advance conservative talk radio ...
Well, good!
Because there's nothing cultured about conservative talk radio.
... Nothing long-term positive that I can think of, Body counts!, No, No, and No, but your point, sir, is well-taken, nonetheless.
“If you think back to 1980,” Bacevich tells Donahue, “and just sort of tick off the number of military enterprises that we have been engaged in that part of the world, large and small, you know, Beirut, Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, Somalia — and on and on, and ask yourself, ‘What have we got done? What have we achieved? Is the region becoming more stable? Is it becoming more Democratic? Are we enhancing America’s standing in the eyes of the people of the Islamic world?’ ‘The answers are, ‘No, no, and no.’ So why, Mr. President, do you think that initiating yet another war in this protracted enterprise is going to produce a different outcome?”
I have not actually watched this interview, because I'm sure I'll agree with everything else he says, but it's out there if you want it.
(h/t: LibertyBelleJ)
Yes, yes, we know some of you never watch the videos. WATCH THIS VIDEO.
-- Doktor Zoom