Wednesday, July 07, 2010

Jeez, Markos, all you had to do was ask Mika

The first rule of Joe Scarborough is: You do not talk about Joe Scarborough.

Except fawningly, of course.

As I noted earlier, I've been blacklisted on MSNBC because I hurt Joe Scarborouth's fee fees. MSNBC president Phil Griffin claims it was because:

I just don't know how one could reasonably expect to be welcomed onto our network while publicly antagonizing one of our hosts at the same time.

Greg Sargent laughs at the absurdity of that Justification:

It's funny. I don't recall the chief of MSNBC publicly banning Liz Cheney from appearing on the network when she cut an entire Web video "publicly antagonizing" Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews for allegedly being too frightened to debate her about terrorism:

[...]

[...]

Update: MSNBC tried to talk me out of going public with this …

(h/t: pourmecoffee)

Fun Fact of the Day

They can rotate their ankles 180 degrees, and so keep a grip while climbing no matter which way they’re facing.

Can you guess which animal we're talking about? It's a fascinating article in many other ways, too.

(x-posted)

Wingnut Whines About Wonder Woman

Remember that new look for Wonder Woman I mentioned last week?

Well, I liked it, as did 100% of the commenters on that post, but one of Breitbart's Otherwise Unemployed Minor Furies (James Hudnall) simply does not care for this new emasculating, cock-teasing, man-hating bitch of an ice princess or the liberals who went all PC on his erstwhile stimulus measure.

Thers has read him so you don't have to.

When Bloggers Go Political Consultant

No, this is not a post about your precious Dave Weigel having a secret new job, because we have been spending too much time talking about him, elsewhere.

No, this is your Jim Newell posting on Journolist 2.0:

Democrats should maybe consider running an ad or two saying, "Wall Street is giving all of its money to Republicans since Democrats stood up to them," because it would be really effective. Not perfectly true, but since the banks apparently do think this way, then it works.

Read everything that came before that.

I'm Rick James, bitchez! ... No, wait. Even better ...


In case you missed it in all the excitement of eating hotdogs and blowing shit up, for freedom, Episode V of "Ayn Rand’s Present Day Adventures" is now available on Wonkette.

And if you've really been out of the loop, here is what a nice guy I am:

I   II   III   IV

(x-posted)

"Said my get up and go musta got up and went"

In my defense, it has been over 90° in the middle of the night, two nights in a row now, in the upper northeast of these United States. We are all Arizonans now.

Also, I happened across this oldie but goodie while driving home this afternoon. Always loved this tune. Play loud. And dance. If you're gonna sweat, it might as well be for a fun reason.

(alt. video link)

See, This Is Why We Can't Have Nice Things

Because giant corporations inevitably bigfoot them. Note the last of the trending topics from a screen shot I just took of the Twitter home page:

Twitter screenshot showing a corporate 'promoted' trend


Despicable You is right, UniversalPictures. You want to entice Twitter into selling you ad space on page itself, fine. Go for it. I'm realistic about ad-supported Web services. But don't pollute the actual user-content stream.

Monday, July 05, 2010

Mamas, Don't Let Your Babies Grow Up To Be Randians

A few days ago, I predicted elsewhere that the latest Peak Wingnut point (achieved thanks to the tanning bed tax taking effect) would last "until next week."

And whaddya know, here we are, in next week.

Remember Wayne Allyn Root (not to be confused, as I momentarily was, with long-time Palinite Wayne Anthony Ross)? He was going to be Vice President of these Galtian United States, until Sarah Palin came along and forced ACORN to steal the election?

No?

Okay. Let's start here: Wikipedia tells me that one of W.A.R.'s children is named "Remington Reagan Root."

Wayne Allyn RootEvery picture tells a story, don't it?


Take it away, Roy.

(h/t: Willie Nelson and Rod Stewart, o/c | x-posted)

"... we’re facing a coalition of the heartless, the clueless and the confused. "

The Shrill One on the GOP (and some Dems, sadly), in the context of their efforts to deny extending unemployment benefits.

(x-posted)

Hi-Tech Plush

Who woulda thunk stuffed animals could be therapeutic for others besides small children?

Stuffed animal toy -- baby seal -- designed for the elderly

Or does this article reveal an especially insidious new tactic being developed by our coming robot overlords?

In other words: Do you ♥ this animal or do you ♣ it?

(x-posted)

Monday Morning Blues

Brad DeLong, via Scott Lemieux:

It is indeed too bad that those who do not remember the history of the 1920s and 1930s appear doomed to repeat it. But the real tragedy is that the rest of us are doomed to repeat it with them.

On a closely related note, Scott also calls attention to the master of the succint, Atrios. Two words: Catfood Commission.

[Added] From an earlier post by Scott:

It seems more and more likely that just as the South ended up largely winning the Civil War after the fact, so does Herbert Hoover seem to be retrospectively winning the Great Depression.

Sunday, July 04, 2010

Hey, whaddya know ...

... a Norman Rockwell painting that is not excessively icky.


Norman Rockwell: Proud Possessor (1940)Norman Rockwell: Proud Possessor (1940)



From the NYT's slide show here. Article here.

Of course we will post this today

All versions of Ray Charles singing this song are great. Thanks for this one to an American friend currently living in Japan, rfrobison.

(alt. video link)

Happy Birthday, America. May you continue to grow.

Saturday, July 03, 2010

Ha ha ha, that K-Lo

Remember the last time we took notice of this sad clown?

Believe it or not, it gets even stupider.

We may need to amend Roy's Rule.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. It's corny.

And yeah, it's the movers and shakers being fawned over by the DC version of People. So to say anything other than "ugh" would be wrongspeak, amirite? But you know what?

Huma Abedin and Anthony Weiner


It was "love at first sight" for Weiner, Hillary told the crowd Wednesday. The Clintons encouraged the match between the Muslim beauty who grew up in Saudi Arabia and the Jewish Democrat from New York City. The couple represents, Bill said in his toast, what he wants "the future of the world to be."

So do I.

(h/t: Jim Newell)

P.S. You probably remember Huma Abedin better from this striking shot (via):


If you're a lesbian like me 'n' Hill, I mean.

Make It Stop

Newell's headline of horror:

America's Prayers Answered: Mike Huckabee Gets Another TV Show

Just how many of the likely presidential Republican candidates for president is Fox going to put on the payroll, anyway?

(previously)

Hurrah for our Freedoms!

Cord JeffersonIn honor of Independence Day and The Unveiling of the Plaques (And Not The Dental Problem Kind Either), Wonkette has published a guest post from "Cord Jefferson," titled "Thanks For Building the Capitol, Slaves!" (Left unreported: whether Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) cried.)

Being that he is a professional writer and all, do you think Wonkette paid him for this work?

Ha ha! You thought that was a racial joke, which, as every RealConservative™ and card-carrying member of the Republican Party will tell you, makes YOU the real racist!

No, it was actually a joke about how no one gets paid to do journalism anymore, in America. (Except for The Big Five.) (And Megan McArdle. (Thanks to Lóðurr?))

In conclusion, it is a good post. Go read it.

(?)

Friday, July 02, 2010

Trust me: It can always get weirder

I wish I were kidding about this:

Glenn Beck University logo


Yes. Glenn Beck University.

There is no point so low that some grifters won't sink to it, and there is no thing so stupid that some wingnuts won't eagerly give it their money.

Am I paranoid to ask how long until this becomes compulsory?

Heil Beck salute

(x-posted)

A Song for Unsung Heroes

Okay, come back. I promise not to sing, actually.

But I do want to give a shoutout to webmaster Phoebe Connelly over at The American Prospect, whose name you probably never get to see (unless maybe if you do a CTRL-u somewhere?). Or, if you write an email to report that your fancy new Adam Serwer blog feed has some glitches, in which case, you get nice emails in return, and personal attention, and so forth.

The point being that RealAmerican™ customer services departments could learn a thing or two from this employee of this elitist liberal organization, and also, that all you TAP people with bylines should be extra nice to her, too (if you aren't already), the end.

Thanks, Phoebe!

Oh, goody

The NYT Mag is doing a big fawning spread on Lindsey Graham. Coming as it does on the heels of last week's Mike Huckabee slobberfest, we can only conclude, once again, that the Biased Liberal Media hates Real America.

__________


[Added] Jim Newell's reaction to the above has a dead-on summary of Graham, not to mention the reason the NYT drives me so crazy when they write about Republicans:

Graham is considered a "moderate" within his Republican party — the South Carolina Republican party — because he is interested in actually working on legislation sometimes. As a "moderate," his role is to lead the White House on for months at a time as the chief Republican negotiator on energy, immigration, and detainee policy bills, and then, late in the game, find some lame excuse to walk away entirely once he realizes that no one else in the Republican party will join him in supporting a Democratic bill, of any kind. This frequently puffy Times profile tends to paper over the fact that its celebrated "new maverick" subject is not very good at completing any of his maverick-y legislative efforts.

Cartoon of the Day

I have been in all seats in this car:

ennui cartoon

(h/t: MPF, via email)

Original artist: Zach Weiner/Sunday Morning Breakfast Cereal, posted 10 June 2009.

On another note, from the same artist: for fans of Alan Turing (and civil rights, o/c).

Caution: Do not visit SMBC if you have someplace else to be in the next few hours.

Say, Mr Orwell: Got a handy new term for "Liberal Media?"

I'm in the middle of an argument over at the Bh.tv forums that started with the Dave Weigel nonsense and has since broadened into a larger discussion about what journalists should and should not do. I am at loggerheads with a woman who has a couple of years under her belt as a working journalist. What follows is a straight copy of the most recent reply I posted over there. I apologize if you feel dropped into the middle of something, but I wanted to call your attention to this story I just heard about as soon as possible, and it has made me too angry to be able to rework my post for a different set of readers.

One note for clarification: where I refer to the phrase "working with," I am referring to my earlier objection to her use of this term to describe how she sees her relationship to those whom she is covering. For more on this, and in a more extreme sense, see Matt Taibbi commenting on Lara Logan's recent disturbing comments, and zero in on where he uses the phrases "work for" and "working for."

__________


@PMP:

Before I get to reading what you've posted in response, let me just quote a bit from my earlier post:

"Working with" is, to me, in the abstract at least, only a short step away from "working for." There is a reason access has become such a loaded term when talking about Teh Media.

and then add this:

“In any dispute, their view is not: What is true? But: How can we preserve our access to the political right and not lose pro-torture readers?"

(Andrew Sullivan via email to Michael Calderone, via Jason Linkins.)

You and everyone else who cares about journalism should read both, but to get you started, here's a bit from the first, to give you some context:

“From the early 1930s until the modern story broke in 2004, the newspapers that covered waterboarding almost uniformly called the practice torture or implied it was torture,” the study noted. But the study found that things changed in the years when “war on terror” became part of the American lexicon.

The New York Times defined waterboarding as torture, or effectively implied that it was, 81.5 percent of the time in articles until 2004, the study found. But during 2002-2008 — when the George W. Bush White House made a concerted effort to normalize harsh interrogation methods for use on terror detainees — the Times “called waterboarding torture or implied it was torture in just 2 of 143 articles." That’s 1.4 percent of the time.

I should point out that the NYT was hardly alone in this quisling behavior, although sadly, the WaPo was not examined.

The study from which Calderone draws his stats is here: (PDF).

More commentary: Sully, Glenn Greenwald, Adam Serwer, and Marcy Wheeler (who observed the missing WaPo aspect).

If my next responses to you in this thread are a bit surly, now you know why: there is no other way to describe what these papers were doing during the Bush years except to say they were "working with" the people they were covering.

[Added] Happy Independence Day, if I forget to say so in a couple of days.

Thought for the Day

From Jim Henley (@UOJim):

We have infinite patience for the low road, infinite impatience for the high / http://goo.gl/VUfP

If you're afraid of shortened URLs, here is what it expands to.

Deep Thought

How come no one ever says My tongue is stuck to the floor of my mouth?

Hurrah, He's Back!

This is how I heard:

tbogg   The bassets have landed. http://tinyurl.com/38phg7w

Also, there was this announcement thing posted just before.

Glad it turned out only to be a vacation, as I sort of denial-y hoped earlier this month.

Thursday, July 01, 2010

But there is only one kind of Republican

Properly attired symbol of the Republican Party: an elephant in a white hood

(previously)

(h/t: KK, via email)

48 Kinds of Awesome

The 24 Types of Libertarian, by Barry Deutsch, stolen, because that's how we do, in the Galt Gulch:

The 24 Types of Libertarian, by Barry Deutsch (political cartoon)(embiggen ← AS IF you need that
Nanny State Handholding Instructional Link)


(h/t: TwinSwords)

[Added] Also via Twin: Digby has passed along a hilarious comment she encountered. Poe's Law -- it's not just for fundies anymore!

[Added2] Follow-up.

Argh

Christopher Hitchens has posted a brief note on Vanity Fair's culture blog, and I reproduce this sad news here:

I have been advised by my physician that I must undergo a course of chemotherapy on my esophagus. This advice seems persuasive to me. I regret having had to cancel so many engagements at such short notice.

Get well soon, Hitch. We will not pray for you, of course, because we know how much that would exasperate you, but you will be in our thoughts.

(h/t: nikkibong)

Well, I know one thing for sure ...

… and that is this: from now on, whenever I am asked to make a short list of my favorite books, Paradise News by David Lodge will certainly have to be included.

I have a minor hangup about books featuring British characters who are less than stellar. I love an American mystery with all sorts of scuzzy characters and cynical narration, the bleaker the setting the better, from Chandler to Vachss and all points in between, but I do not at all care for the same story set in England. It's kind of like the problem I have with casinos -- I once imagined they'd be filled with James Bonds, and later, at least with Ace Rothsteins and Ginger McKennas, and it turns out that what you really see in Vegas are waddlers and stool-bound lumps clad in overstressed sweatsuits, carrying the rent money in cups of coins, festooned with junk jewelry and Kourtesy Kards on coiled leashes -- more depressing than I can articulate. British lowlifes in novels make me feel the same sense of despair. Paradise News, it seemed at the start, was going to be even worse -- it was not a mystery, not even a hard-boiled or hard-bitten version of another genre. I sighed internally a few times, wondering rather nastily, "I guess this is supposed to be some kind of farce, maybe? And why did CKC hand me this thing, anyway?"

The story starts off set in Heathrow Airport. A number of characters are brought onstage, by ones and twos and fours, all of whom are seen at first from the perspective of a couple of employees of Travelwise Tours. These people, we soon find out, have all purchased the same holiday package deal that will put them on a plane and take them to Hawaii. A few pages in, we meet the Walshes, a forty-something son and his father. It turns out that these two are not English, but Irish, so their less than admirable natures made me wonder even harder how many more pages I'd give this book. Hints of a looming introduction to an overbearing sister did not ease my mind, either. (*ducks*)

As it happened (laziness while reading in bed, with nothing else in immediate reach), I pressed on just a bit more, and then it dawned on me that it was no longer a struggle and had not been since … well, I couldn't remember when. I was reminded of the jolt I felt about a half-hour into Three Kings when I watched that movie for the first time -- hey, sit up straight and pay attention; this shit is SERIOUSLY GOOD. And then it turned into a sheer delight, sullied only once more: by the eventual realization of how few pages remained.

I don't want to tell you much more than that, because if you like the book even a tenth as much as I did, you will be mad at me about every bit I did not let you come upon for yourself. On a related note, I beg you: do not look at the Wikipedia entry for this book. It is only a stub right now, but for all of its incompleteness, it manages to give away something you really don't want to know ahead of time. If it weren't so easy to revert edits, I would log in just to slap a 72-point scarlet red SPOILER ALERT across the top of that page.

Where were we? Oh, yes. I was going to stop talking about the book. But wait. Just two more things.

First, if you like the sheer decency of Dick Francis's heroes, you will come to like the main character in this book. And second, there is another aspect that also grabbed me: woven throughout are some fascinating threads to do with what the author/narrator calls "radical demythologizing theology." If you've been on a life journey at all like mine -- raised in a traditional form of one of the monotheistic religions that bit by bit had to be set aside as variously too annoying, too comical, too simplistic -- impossible to believe, fer crissakes -- I think you will find a lot to chew on here. Or more accurately: to note, and to set aside for later pondering -- this is not at all a ponderous book, and you will want to rush along to find out what happens next in the matters exclusive to this world. Lodge touches on some weighty topics (intelligent theology is only one of them) with all the grace of a jazz soloist who understands that silences and notes left out are what make a truly great piece of music. You may find yourself dog-earing lots of pages or making notes in the margin. Had my copy not been a loaner, I sure would have.

Or, you may not care for the theological bits at all. Not to worry. They will not get in your way in the slightest. The story enchants all by itself.

After I finished Paradise News, I turned to the back cover, and there was a line, sadly, attributed only to The Cleveland Plain Dealer, that I could not possibly improve upon:

In the quietest manner imaginable, David Lodge has written a vaultingly great book.

All right. Forget everything I said up till then, and pretend I just said that.

__________


Afterwords


Odd note: I Googled "radical demythologizing theology", wondering whether it was a standard academic term. Apparently it is not. And now I must deal with the guilt of robbing Moristotle of a claim he has held for the past three years: up till now, the only English-speaking person on the planet who had typed that three-word phrase onto a computer connected to the Internet. (Sorry about that, Mo.)

Turns out that the post is an excerpt from the book, a passage that evidently resonated with Morris as much as it did with me. Oh, and, uh, spoiler alert, if your browser did not show you the fancy tooltip thing I added to that link.

Even odder (I love saying that) note: Morris's profile tells us where he lives, generally. The handwritten inscription in the front of my loaner copy -- it was a gift from CKC to her hubby -- says, in part, "From a used bookstore in North Carolina." Could it possibly be that I have just finished the same exact book that Morris once read?

Long-time readers know dread what's coming now! Yep: this only strengthens my suspicion.

Moar Crazy in the Party Platform, Plz!

In light of the charming notions recently expressed by the Republican Party's branches in Texas and Montana, let's have a look at Idaho.

Hmmm. Pretty much against Teh Gheys getting married. But what's this? Language reserving the institution exclusively for …

... a "naturally born" man and woman, going the extra mile beyond conventional gay marriage bans and making sure to exclude transgendered folks, as well.

Awesome! What else? Gold and silver fantasies, state nullification wankery, repealing the 17th Amendment (that again!), and … what's this? Loyalty oaths?

Outstanding!

You know, when you look at their logo …

Idaho GOP (KKK?) logo


… it looks a lot like a guy in a white robe, sitting down, wearing a pointy hood, doesn't it? Maybe even leaning against a lynching tree.

(x-posted)

ShareThis