But admit you want one of your own. Particularly if you have cats.
You'll want to go full-screen with this one. It's about three minutes long.
(h/t: Michael Moyer via Bora Zivkovic)
But admit you want one of your own. Particularly if you have cats.
You'll want to go full-screen with this one. It's about three minutes long.
(h/t: Michael Moyer via Bora Zivkovic)
For wingnuts, I mean.
michelleinbklyn Tear gas is known to cause miscarriage. Shouldn't pro-lifers join lefties in condemning its use by the Oakland PD? latindispatch.com/2011/05/19/chi …
You go, Powerpuff Ninja!
In news that probably comes as no surprise, viewership numbers for this year's World Series are down, especially among the Coveted Demographic, as those in the teevee biz like to say.
It almost certainly isn't helping that the two teams are who they are -- if I had a nickel for every time I've heard or read some variation on Ugh. La Russa? Texas? How can you root for either of these teams? I could buy Fox Sports and fire Joe Buck.
I'll tell you what I'd also do with my new power: stop the interstitial ads. I am convinced that the casual fan, even the young one whose filters are much better developed, gets to a point where having the game itself constantly interrupted with swirling promos for other shows and inane sponsorships like "this call to the bullpen brought to you by …" is no longer tolerable, especially given a handy remote control. Two and a half or three minutes between each half-inning, not to mention between each pitching change, not to mention the billboards in the background of every single shot, ought to be plenty, even for the greediest teevee executives. And failing that, they should at least realize that you can only corrupt the product so much before other things start looking more attractive.
And really, get an announcer who doesn't hate baseball and analysts who ought not have been put out to pasture a decade ago. I guarantee you there would be a measurable increase in viewership if Gary Cohen, Ron Darling, and Keith Hernandez were calling the games, and I say this as a Yankee fan.
Take that, windmill!
(h/t: KK, via email)
... where Scotty tried to talk to the computer, and when that didn't work, and Bones handed him the mouse, he tried to speak into the mouse?
(h/t: Well-known magazine columnist Sean M. Carroll (in the near future, if not in some other universe). And see also the follow-up post.)
... at all, to the point of hesitating to link to a post that once again exposes him for what he is, this opening from TBogg is too good not to pass along:
Over at Human Events, which is like Big Journalism for people who find Dana Loesch too erudite …
(pic. source: some wingnut who appears to think that reading captions is elitist)
John Barrow's lecture on continued fractions, which I finished watching three hours ago, still has the hairs on my neck and forearms gibbering about.
Visit the link above for the transcript and/or the slides. (Or just click those links, obvs.) You'll almost certainly want the latter, if the talk grabs your attention at all.
And remember:
[Added] I see by looking at the transcript that the lecture stems from Barrow's article published in Issue 11 of Plus Magazine, "Chaos in Numberland: The secret life of continued fractions."
... but only had 5 bucks between them. So Bush took the fiver and bought a sausage.
From an old Ars Technica article about the Darknet:
As Pirate Party chairman Rickard Falkvinge points out, there is a fundamental incompatibility between enforcement of contemporary copyright law and the cherished freedoms of a democratic society: "there are much more fundamental values at stake here than copyright," says Falkvinge. "The new technology has brought society to a crossroads. The only way to enforce today's unbalanced copyright laws is to monitor all private communications over the Internet. Today's copyright regime cannot coexist with an open society that guarantees the right to private communication."
Cory Doctorow has been speaking eloquently on this subject for years. If you're not already aware of his thoughts, here's an example a short version and here's an example of a long version.
We can talk about Obama's hypocrisy all day, but in the end his Middle East agenda at least makes some kind of sense. The American conservative approach has demonstrably been to invade a place, fuck the shit out of it, rack up a trillion dollar bill, and then bitch when someone else cleans up the mess.
-- Roy Edroso
On a related note, from the same author: "Rightbloggers Denounce the End of the Iraq Occupation and the 'Horrific Murder' of Gaddafi."
On a note related to the previous post (my linking to which, it must be admitted, more than anything tends to reinforce the point of Daniel Kahneman's article), I encourage you to read "Don’t Blink! The Hazards of Confidence." Here's an excerpt:
The confidence we experience as we make a judgment is not a reasoned evaluation of the probability that it is right. Confidence is a feeling, one determined mostly by the coherence of the story and by the ease with which it comes to mind, even when the evidence for the story is sparse and unreliable. The bias toward coherence favors overconfidence. An individual who expresses high confidence probably has a good story, which may or may not be true.
The part near the end about those involved in the stock market is particularly instructive. Some funny illustrations, from Tim Enthoven, too.
[Added] Uncle Eb also liked the article, and added some artwork that I just had to swipe.
Though, of course, we shouldn't be too harsh on eagles for their poor judgment. That could be construed as America-hating, after all.
That people so often believe themselves to be right is no proof that they are; the only difference between the Church of Rome and the Church of England is that the former is infallible while the latter is never wrong.
-- Jill Lepore, "The Commandments: The Constitution and its Worshipers"
If a Republican had been responsible for the foreign-policy markers of the past three years, the Party would be commissioning statues.
From David Remnick's post about "Muammar Qaddafi's death and Republican politics."
Dr. Lisa M. Bates reports:
In the text function of my BlackBerry there is a sidebar menu of emoticons (how ridiculous is that?) that shows the yellow smiley faces, except they are also crying and raging, and winking and blowing kisses, etc. I sent a fairly new acquaintance a ‘big hug’ emoticon — which, for the record, was ironic. But anyway, on his iPhone it came up with the symbols, not the smiley face, which don’t look anything like a big hug. From his perspective they look like a view of, er, splayed lady parts: ({}). He then ran around his lab showing colleagues excitedly what I had just sent him. Half (mostly men) concurred with his interpretation, and the others (mostly women) didn’t and probably thought he was kind of a desperate perv.”
Due to the Cardinals having made it to the World Series, additional revenue has been generated for the city, and it now looks like city workers will not be required to take a furlough, after all. Hooray!
Okay, that's not actually nearly enough to make you like Tony La Russa. Never forget. Paste-eater.
It occurs to me that the frequency of cuts to his mug may be diminished tonight. Due to Fox's urge to show George and Laura Bush's non-reaction to every other play. And of course, all of this will be smeared with the stultifying gooeyness of Joe Buck's nonstop drone. Which completely explains the excitement of this headline.
This has energized two groups who are notoriously apathetic and lacking in civic engagement — the young and the poor — and has done so outside the existing architectures of power and politics.
Yes.
And numbers from the sidebar: "Not Quite 99 Percent, But Most."
Remember that three-page memo describing how to "avoid making taxpayers liable in the future for the kind of reckless speculation that caused the financial crisis and resulting bailout …"?
Wall Street firms have spent countless millions of dollars trying to water down the original Volcker proposal and have succeeded in inserting numerous exemptions. Now they’re claiming it’s too complex to understand and too costly to adopt.
Apparently, all of Michele Bachmann's paid New Hampshire campaign staffers have quit. Go Lexington! On Concord! (?)
While looking for news of that after seeing it mentioned on Twitter, I came across an even more delicious headline:
Michele Bachmann ignored by S.F. protesters
How often does the Pentagon award contracts to defense companies that have already been proven to be defrauding taxpayers? A report the Department of Defense did at the request of Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) reveals an answer that should make Washington very uncomfortable.
The report, released today, showed that hundreds of defense contractors found guilty of civil fraud received more than $1.1 trillion in defense contracts since 2001. The study took into account only companies that were found to have defrauded taxpayers of more than $1 million dollars.
But still, you should read the whole thing.
Here are a news post and Verizon's disclosure statement.
Hat tip to the good people at Demand Progress, who have a petition you might like to sign.
What, another hour-long video? Yes. Sorry, can't help it. Been stumbling across some good ones lately.
This talk, by David Keith, delivered at the Equinox Summit: Energy 2030 in June 2011, is about the most thought-provoking one I've ever heard on global warming, related resource issues, AGW mitigation, and our options and responsibilities. Denialists will no doubt be overjoyed at the cherry-picking they can do, but that doesn't mean it doesn't deserve the attention of the reality-based community.
... just in case you don't follow me there, please read Eric Alterman's "Think Again: The Continuing Curse of ‘On the One-Handism’."
[Added] Don't miss Uncle Eb's related recommendation in Comments.
We haven’t had a shortage of demands and solutions. We’ve had a shortage of mass movements.
-- Stephen Lerner, in an interview by Ezra Klein
Apologies for it actually being LOTD from three weeks ago. Hat tip to Frank Pasquale, via James Kwak, via Brad DeLong.
Get one of these ...
... for free, from Democracy for America (alt. link).
[Added] Sadly, these are not available.
But maybe if you write to Clay Bennett and ask really nicely ...
The above via the Center for American Progress, in an email inviting me to read an article titled, "The Legitimate Gripes of the Other 99 Percent/Amid the Cacophony of Protest Emerges a Coherent Set of Valid Complaints."
I love the idea that I’m “bullying” Rick Santorum, because all he wants to do is write anti-gay bigotry into the Constitution, prevent me from being at my partner’s bedside in a medical emergency, get in a time machine to prevent me from being able to adopt my son, reinstate Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. Literally destroy my life. That's all he wants to do. And I made a joke at his expense. I’m the bad guy. And he’s the victim. All he wants to do is beat this to death. How dare we — tease him.
-- Dan Savage, via Dawn K. Johnson
(h/t for the RT: Jim Henley)
The schadenfreude fixes for New Yorkers just keep on coming.
... Jason Varitek, who had chastised a Globe reporter for calling him at home seeking comment for last week’s article, did a U-turn and entertained another Globe reporter at his house on Tuesday.
Also, the team owner never wanted that Carl Crawford, anyway, and one of the beer-drinkin' BUT NOT IN THE DUGOUT!!!1!, chicken-orderin', pitchers videogamers maintains this is All Francona's Fault.
Sigh. Denizens of the Sensible™ Center® like Mark Landler will be the death of us all.
But the increasingly caustic tone of the president’s attacks on Congress raises a question: How long can Mr. Obama continue to hammer Republicans without exhausting the patience of voters who elected him to be an alternative to Washington partisanship — and without risking the perception that he is part of the problem?
And how much a part of the problem are aging, very well compensated journamalists who sit around and write "analysis" pieces and then go out and find three vox pop quotes to support their preconceived notions?
He asked rhetorically.
A lecture from Freeman Dyson, about an hour long, that is a good review of the breakthroughs he's been a part of in his life, seasoned with his usual iconoclasm and sense of humor. If you weren't in Waterloo on 1 June 2011, you can join me in blaming Canada thanking the Perimeter Institute and TVO.
Republicans are the ones who have made faith part of the presidential test. Now we’ll see if Mitt can pass it.
-- Maureen Dowd
And how say you, Mr. Hitchens?
(h/t: TC and Carlos, via email)
There's an article in the StarTribune that you might have a look at. It describes a massive effort by Minnesota's Roman Catholic bishops to pass a law sanctioning discrimination.
Minnesota's Roman Catholic bishops are taking the unusual step of urging parish priests across the state to form committees to help get the proposed marriage amendment passed by voters in 2012.
"It is imperative that we marshal our resources to educate the faithful about the church's teachings on these matters, and to vigorously organize and support a grass-roots effort to get out the vote to support the passage of this amendment," Twin Cities Archbishop John Nienstedt wrote in a letter to his priests dated Oct. 4.
The letter asks parish priests to "appoint a captain or co-chairs to lead a special parish ad hoc committee to spearhead this effort."
[...]
Jason Adkins, executive director of the Minnesota Catholic Conference, the public policy arm of the Catholic Church in Minnesota, said the state's other bishops are expected to send out similar letters, "if they haven't already done so."
"We believe it [marriage] is a vital social institution, and it's under attack in the courts, the Legislature and the culture," Adkins said. "And it would have profound consequences if marriage is in fact redefined. That's why we're putting extraordinary resources toward making sure this marriage amendment gets passed."
Emph. added.
And there was this, last year:
Minnesota's Catholic bishops made another unorthodox move before last fall's legislative elections when they mailed DVDs to nearly 400,000 Catholics across the state, with a message encouraging them to support a state amendment defining marriage between a man and woman.
Shoutout to Rev. Mike Tegeder, who …
... said he spoke up against the effort at a meeting of priests and the archbishop this week.
Tegeder, a frequent critic of Archbishop Nienstedt's policies, said he believes the letter calling for parishes to form committees to organize a get-out-the-vote effort is "imprudent" and "divisive."
"There's all kinds of wonderful ways to promote marriage, which I do on a regular basis and other churches are doing," he said. "You don't promote marriage by taking away the rights of a small segment of the population, many of whom are not Catholic or have no connection to the Catholic Church."
Emph. added.
If you'd like to kick in some bucks to help preserve equality and civil rights, Freedom to Marry invites you to click the button below. If you're a Roman Catholic parishioner in Minnesota, you might also think about the money you're giving to your church and where it's going.