Friday, October 03, 2008

Hate Speech?

(Updated below)

Via PZ Myers, I understand that Pat Condell's latest video has been removed from YouTube's site. Condell's YouTube page confirms this. He says he got a notice that it violated YouTube's policy against hate speech: "The specific portion of the video found to be in violation occurs around 2:20."

Like PZ, I have the sense that Condell goes a little too far, in this video and in some of his others, although it is hard for me to articulate precisely why. PZ's thoughts come close to what I think I think. However, I don't accept that this video is hate speech, especially in comparison to other stuff that I've seen on YouTube that has been up for months or years. Offensive? Sure. Sometimes even to me. But not hate speech.

I am inclined to think that because Condell is gaining prominence, he's also picked up a following of enemies who likely bombard YouTube with complaints every time he posts a new video. I am also convinced that criticisms of organized religion are treated much more severely than are criticisms of any other line of thought, even by many secular-minded people.

This isn't Condell at his best (here's a better and funnier rant), but I'm going to embed it anyway, partly in protest of YouTube's actions, and partly to hear what your take on it is.

(alt. video link)

More Condell vids are available on his YouTube page, as noted above, and on his own personal site. Subtitled versions are available here. Audio-only versions are available here.


[Added] PZ notes more YouTube censorship.


Update

2008-10-04 01:56

Reinstated, and it feels so goo-oo-ood …

The following now appears on Pat Condell's YouTube page:

Enormous thanks to everyone who uploaded the video and to everyone who contacted YouTube. And my thanks to YouTube for reinstating the video. I'm very much obliged.

Thanks to John Evo, who brought this to my attention in the comments.

Highly Recommended Reading

From the latest issue of Rolling Stone magazine: Make-Believe Maverick, by Tim Dickinson.

This is a long and thoroughly researched piece that reviews John McCain's life from his days in the Naval Academy to the present, and shows how, time and again, every decision was made purely for his own self-interest. Among other things, it details the nepotism that allowed him to survive dismissal and advance throughout his military career, shines a light on the myth of his "heroism" as a POW, explains the Keating Five scandal and how that led to his embrace of campaign finance reform as a way to repackage his image, and traces the progression from occasional actual moderate to hard-line neocon. There's also a fascinating thread running throughout that describes how McCain learned to work the media, from the fire on the USS Forrestal through the cover-up of Cindy McCain's drug problems to playing a lead role in selling the invasion of Iraq as a quick and easy task.

Even if you already have a dim view of of McCain, you'll probably get a lot out of the exhaustive documentation. In any case, you should forward it to anyone you know who still buys into McCain's wholly fictional and consciously self-created image.

[Added] Companion video now available. Details here.

Your Moment of Awwww

Oliver Willis brings you today's edition.

Good Catch By Jed

The Biggest Fundamental Difference

Factchecking the Debate

Watertiger reports 18 lies from Palin in last night's debate.

Needs better linkification, but it's a place to start, if you're of a mind.

[Added] More details here.

It Was a Draw!

Says Michael Bérubé.

Seven Minutes of Awesome

Change of pace from the VP debate chatter: Here's part of a speech given at the Steelworkers Convention, 1 July 2008, by AFL-CIO Secretary-Treasurer Richard Trumka.

Powerful stuff.

(alt. video link | alt. video link 2)

(h/t: TC, via email)

Help Frame the Narrative!

Vote in unscientific polls that the MSM relies on to tell their stories!

A list gathered up by MoveOn.org: here.

Thursday, October 02, 2008

Horserace Update

Via TPM: McCain pulls out of Michigan, effectively conceding he has no chance there.

In conference call, McCain campaign implicitly acknowledges erstwhile dead-safe red states (Indiana, North Carolina) are now battleground states, as are other states that Bush won (Virginia, Ohio, Florida, Missouri), most of which now show Obama in the lead.

For true junkies only: FiveThirtyEight accuses RealClearPolitics of cooking the books on polling summaries. Delicious, to my taste. (Also see follow-up post.)

TPM's Ultimate Palin Collection

Their video library available here.

Live Blogging the VP Debate

9:02 -- Intro. Hi, Gwen. Hope the wingnuts have only steeled your spine.

9:05 -- First question. Both look like they're referring to notes. Hope this doesn't persist.

9:09 -- So far, nothing but boilerplate and talking points. Hope someone is keeping count of how many times Palin says "reform," "maverick," etc.

9:10 -- Interesting that Palin blames the "predatory lenders." This is different from the wingnut trope that poor, irresponsible (read: minorities) people caused the crash.

9:14 -- the "$42,000" tax raise lie again

9:15 -- Palin goes for "talk straight." Yeah, that was spontaneous. Not. Note she switched to saying "Barack" after hearing Biden say "John."

9:18 -- I call "garish" at the size of Palin's flag lapel pin, but I expect my view on this will not be the universal one.

9:20 -- Biden good on specifics of "McCain will tax your health care". Oooh. "Bridge to Nowhere" worked in! Minor zing.

9:23 -- Palin says McCain doesn't tell one thing to one group and another to another. LOL! That's been his entire campaign so far -- flip-flopping.

9:25 -- Palin says she's only been at this for five weeks. Possible snippet for an attack ad.

9:29 -- Extremely clumsy change of subject by Palin when asked a direct question about bankruptcy/mortgages, to energy. Obviously, she's determined to spit out every talking point she's crammed in prep. Wonder if that will come across to people not predisposed to dislike her.

9:31 -- Palin "I'm not one to attribute blah blah" on climate change. Yep, we've heard that before. She didn't mangle it quite as badly this time.

9:35 -- Palin says "nukyular."

9:37 -- Good answer from Biden on same-sex couples. Palin kind of trying to have it both ways, but good enough for her base, I guess.

9:39 -- Sad to hear Biden clearly against gay marriage. Realities of politics, but still sad.

9:40 -- What's your exit strategy from Iraq, Governor? Not answered.

9:41 -- Biden calls her on that. Good man. Could have been a little punchier on his/Obama's plan besides timeline. Good on rebuttal, though.

9:47 -- Palin says "nukyular" again. And again. Keeps invoking Petraeus and Ahmadinejad. And now Castro? More talking points dumpage. Yep, got the "naivety" word in, too.

9:51 -- Biden gets McCain's Spain gaffe into the diplomacy discussion. Nice.

9:52 -- Interesting. Palin doesn't address the Spain thing. Probably for the best -- there really is no walking back that one.

9:56 -- Biden: "haven't heard how his [McCain's] policy will be different from George Bush's." Like the repetition, from the point of view of hammering the underinformed voters.

9:58 -- More clumsy transition to pre-planned talking points by Palin. Clearly, she's reading from notes. Wonder how many will pick this up.

9:59 -- Biden reading from notes, too. Granted, both have been writing them in real time, but some talking points from both sound planned and look like they come from prepared notes.

10:01 -- Biden good on making the point on Obama ahead of McCain on recognizing that Afghanistan was a problem after McCain had earlier declared victory.

10:03 -- As important as the questions that Ifill has asked, I'm annoyed that she has yet to ask anything that couldn't have been easily anticipated. No chance to see whether the candidates can think on their feet.

10:04 -- I am really getting tired of Palin's cutesy smile when she delivers attack lines. Probably works with her fan base. Wonder how the undecideds see it.

10:07 -- Palin mentions, not for the first time, blunders of Bush Administration. Wonder if that will work for the underinformed.

10:09 -- Biden slips in "Bush Doctrine." Hee hee.

10:10 -- Ewww. She just winked.

10:12 -- Palin clumsily says "there you go again." Leftosphere hurls.

10:14 -- weird thing where Palin says Constitution should give more authority to VP over Senate. What's that about?

10:14 -- Palin: "John McCain has already tapped me." Snicker.

10:16 -- Good follow-up by Ifill on the Constitution question. No real answer from Palin on it, but hints of "flexibility" in Constitution strikes me as a weird thing, especially given the way Cheney has run amok. Good for Biden for jumping all over this.

10:18 -- Biden keeps hammering on Cheney. Excellent.

10:19 -- Why does Palin keep saying "tapped?" She stands firm for American exeptionalism. Bone for the base.

10:22 -- I am really tired of Palin's smiling at weird places. It comes off like a news reader, not a serious leader.

10:23 -- Nice to see Biden push back against the "maverick" mantra at the end of the debate. Plant those seeds.

10:28 -- Second time Palin says she has "a very diverse family." Clank.

10:29 -- Maybe the "diverse family" thing is dog whistle to soften the unwed pregnant daughter problem? [Added 12:57: in retrospect, probably more to remind everyone what a Supermom she is, esp. wrt to the Down's Syndrome baby.]

10:29 -- LOL @ Palin claiming she wishes she could answer more questions. Please. And then works in an attack on the mainstream media, too. Please.

10:31 -- Palin smiles while predicting doom. Ick.

10:33 -- Done.

10:35 -- Weird to have everyone on stage after the applause has ended.

10:36 -- The all-important baby prop. Was there really any other reason to bring a 1-year-old to this event?

10:39 -- Stage empties. We now stand by while every MSM pundit says Palin won by beating expectations.

Closing thoughts: No obvious gaffes. I found the whole thing pretty useless. The format allowed for little else besides spouting sound bites and slogans, and since I've been following the race pretty closely, I've heard them all before too many times. Probably people just tuning into the race will feel differently.

I'm sure Palin did nothing but boost enthusiasm for her supporters tonight. I'm 99% sure she did nothing to change the minds of those who think she's not ready for the job. I have no idea how the undecideds will view this. Some, doubtless, will find her cutesiness appealing. Some, I hope, will think it made her look shallow. Ultimately, I think no major changes happen in the polls as a result of this, although there will probably be a little bit of a temporary bump for McCain/Palin. Or, at least, a slowing of their declining numbers.

Reminder for the TV-less

Live streaming of the debate appears to be available on CNN.com/live/.

Additional info here.

VP Debate Preview 5

Best opening paragraph I've read in a long while:

THE other day the bookselling guest on Colbert was Nick Carr, who frankly came off as a scold, and impatient with his host's humor injections, perhaps because he's just written the Why Johnny Can't Read of the Google era, and without pausing to consider who'd read it. It's interesting that most works in the genre come from men entering the second half of middle age, when the memory of how literacy was doomed, doomed! because of their own supposed addiction to teevee, radio, the talkies, the flickers, the flivver, or the penny dreadful has faded, to be replaced by a recognition of the illiterate superficiality and sexual attractiveness of Today's Youts. And so on. And I say this as an unfashionable admirer of Marshall McLuhan, if no partner to his sunny disposition; yes yes yes, media shapes the way we relate to the world and our information about it. God and fiefdom shaped the 14th century serf. What are we to do about it? In the short term, given free access to free information, it seems there will always be people who realize that knowledge is complex, pluralistic, and seldom, if ever, easily unearthed, just as there will be those who read Ayn Rand. Perhaps it's a good idea to look up from this IT shit every now and again, and take a gander at the people who actually produce information, rather than just shuffle it around. Have a look at the biologists and paleontologists who give of their free time to combat religion-borne illiteracy. We are not in danger of the whole wide world becoming wikipedia-mired morons with five-second attention spans; we may be in some slight danger of all our morons becoming Google addicts. I'm not sure where the real threat is there. That they'll get tired of Britney Spears that much quicker?

The second paragraph begins:

Which brings us to Sarah Palin.

... which explains my title. But never mind that. Go read the latest from Doghouse Riley.

And yeah, I know I'm just shuffling information around here.

VP Debate Preview 4

Letterman's take:

(alt. video link)

(h/t: Jed Lewison)


If you missed them: VP Debate Preview 1, Preview 2, and Preview 3.

Oh, and if you forgot why Dave might have it in a little for McCain/Palin, see here.

CC: Email to Instapundit

Following a link from TBogg to a recent Instapundit post, I was moved to send the following to Glenn Reynolds:

Prof. Reynolds:

I was pointed to a recent post you did on media bias. I read that one and the earlier one of yours that you linked to from within that post. I also remember reading, a few days back, a post you did passing along a report from an anonymous source in a "major outlet's newsroom" (I think that's how you put it), describing how that outlet was "in the tank" for Obama.

I take by your implication from the latest of these posts that you would not claim that Fox News is an unbiased source of news. (Or perhaps you would.) At any rate, I would be curious if you'd offer some examples of news sources that you view as mostly having a neutral point of view, and/or a consistent ability to report the news objectively, particularly as it concerns the presidential election.

Thanks.

Brendan Keefe

I imagine he gets more email than he has time to answer, but if he does, I'll pass along his responses. Also, if anyone happens to notice this question being addressed on Instapundit, I'd appreciate it if you'd let me know.

VP Debate Preview 3

A quick clip of Bill Clinton, on the campaign trail in Florida, on why the VP choice is so important:

(alt. video link)

(h/t: TPM)


If you missed them: VP Debate Preview 1 and Preview 2.

FileZilla 3.1.3.1 Released

The FTP client FileZilla has released an upgrade (actually, a couple since I last noticed). Looks like both the upgrade to v3.1.3 and the latest, to v3.1.3.1, are bug fixes without security implications. Still, might as well do the upgrade. It's painless. Here's how.

Launch FileZilla. If you have automatic updates turned on, you'll be prompted to start the upgrade. If not, Help → Check for Updates ought to get you squared away. You'll be walked through the installation in the usual way. Probably you'll want to keep your existing settings (the default). Basically, clicking "Next" every time will do what you want.

When installation is completed, the program won't restart automatically. Just start it the way you always do.

If the built-in update procedure doesn't work for you, you can download the latest version directly, by visiting the FileZilla home page.

VP Debate Preview 2

From TPM:

Sarah's Greatest Hits!

(alt. video link)

VP Debate Preview 1 here, if you missed it.

Longer video segments from which the above was assembled have been posted on and/or linked to from this blog over the past couple of weeks. If you missed any, here's a list, most recent post first:

Angry Johnny

John McCain, in a meeting with the Des Moines Register's editorial board, narrated by Josh Marshall of TPM.

Here are some ther things I noticed besides McCain's seething manner that Josh concentrates on: the occasional creepy smile, the grim way he sticks to lies that have already been thoroughly debunked, his utter denial of what polls show about his choice of running mate (including in her own state), the way he shows no shame in labeling himself with the names he used to pretend the media made up for him; e.g., "straight talk," "putting my country first," and "my honorable service."

And of course, can't go through an interview without John McCain reminding you that he was a POW. Because he doesn't like to talk about that.

(alt. video link)

Oh, and how many tongues flicks did you catch? I caught inner ones around 1:40 and 2:50, and the full lizard at around 1:57, 2:03, and 5:25.


[Added] More Angry Johnny.

From Sea to Shining Sea

... or, at least from the DFHosphere:

For conservatives, everything is the fault of liberals, except when there is no possible alibi for conservatives. Then it's everyone's fault. These days, even bipartisanship is mostly an angle, something to be tried when all else fails.
-- Roy Edroso

... to the opinion pages of the Wall Street Journal:

But I had forgotten about conservatives' extraordinary instincts for blame-evasion. This is a movement, after all, that blandly recasts its greatest idols as traitors once their popularity has crashed; that routinely sloughs off responsibility for … well … anything since, by its logic, conservatism has never really been tried in the first place.
-- Thomas Franks

Both well worth reading in full.

Please Don't Vote

Voting info below. But first, enjoy the best PSA ever:

(alt. video link)

(alt. video link, with bad words bleeped, for sharing with your sensitive friends)

maps.google.com/vote


Follow that link, type in your home address, and you'll be able to find out:

  • Whether you're already registered to vote
  • How much time you have left, if not
  • How to get an absentee ballot
  • Where to get more voter information

among other things.

(h/t: Oliver Willis)


Another handy site for checking your registration status and finding other information about voting:

VoteForChange.com


VP Debate Preview 1

(Modified since original posting to include what's now the first video clip)

In thinking about the upcoming debate, where the consensus says that expectations have been so lowered by now that Sarah Palin will be declared "the winner" by the chattering classes if she manages to get through the whole thing without needing Steve Schmidt to come on stage to throw a blanket over her, I thought I'd gather up some thoughts of others that reflect on what she has shown us so far. If nothing else, these should help coat, soothe, and protect your stomach lining in anticipation what we're likely to hear over the next couple of days from tools like Tom Brokaw.

Katha Pollit's Sarah Palin, Affirmative Action Babe begins:

Ah, meritocracy! Not so long ago, conservatives had a lock on it: no affirmative action, no A's for effort, no competitions where everyone gets a prize. People who complained that racism or sexism or any other ism was holding them back were whiners looking for excuses. They either didn't want to work hard or, as Charles Murray claimed in The Bell Curve, they weren't smart enough to make the grade.

Well, never mind. Sarah Palin has done for meritocracy what she's done for those other conservative obsessions: working mothers (you go, girl!), teen pregnancy (a challenge!), masculine authority (the first dude?)--to say nothing of gravitas, statesmanship, wisdom and all those other weighty abstract nouns George Will likes to talk about.

... and just keeps getting better from there.

I came across Pollit's piece by following a link contained in Michael Bérubé's So you Palin-mockers think you’re so smart. Yes, you should click that link and read the whole thing. Longish post but worth it, and the surprise ending is an extra reward.

Also quite good: Paul Campos's Please make it stop, an analysis of Palin's Supreme Court non-answers, and his earlier post, Turning trick questions. Be sure to follow the "this column" link within the latter.

Not in the mood to read? (Silly question, if you made it to this point, maybe.) Okay, via Oliver Willis, here's a clip of the answer that drove Campos to the keyboard:

(alt. video link)

Here's the same Palin response, in a side-by-side comparison with Joe Biden's answer to the same question (h/t: uncle ebeneezer, and sorry for the lead-in commercial):

(alt. video link)

Here's another comparison of the VP candidates, on the question of separation between church and state (same apology):

(alt. video link)

I was going to complain somewhere in this post about the way the McCain camp gamed the debate -- answers to be kept short, and no follow-up questions allowed -- but after sitting through these latest streams of Palin once again demonstrating the inability to form complete sentences even from clichés, maybe it's just as well. Call me a Katha Pollit elitist.

(I'm already a Richard Dawkins elitist.)

Wednesday, October 01, 2008

Lost in the Excitement

Right before the onset of the current financial apocalypse and the ensuing shift of attention to the non-suspended campaign and the non-postponed debate, there was a story just beginning to break which is worth revisiting. It concerns John McCain's campaign manager, Rick Davis, and Davis's lobbyist connections to Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. I did one post on it, pointing to a nice piece of investigative work by the New York Times.

The reaction by the McCain campaign to the Times story was, of course, to come clean with a little straight talk attempt to demonize the Times.

I was looking around on YouTube for something else, and I came across the video clip embedded below, which provides a good review and reminder of what seemed like it was going to be The Story for a day or two. It's from Rachel Maddow's new show on MSNBC.

First, Maddow interviews Newsweek's Michael Isikoff, who dug up another important piece of the story, an excerpt of which follows.

But neither the Times story—nor the McCain campaign—revealed that Davis's lobbying firm, Davis Manafort, based in Washington, D.C., continued to receive $15,000 a month from Freddie Mac until last month—long after the Homeownership Alliance had been terminated. The two sources, who requested anonymity discussing sensitive information, told NEWSWEEK that Davis himself approached Freddie Mac in 2006 and asked for a new consulting arrangement that would allow his firm to continue to be paid. The arrangement was approved by Hollis McLoughlin, Freddie Mac's senior vice president for external relations, because "he [Davis] was John McCain's campaign manager and it was felt you couldn't say no," said one of the sources. [McLoughlin did not return phone calls].

When asked about his own campaign manager's associations with the mortgage giants, McCain, in an interview with CNBC on Sunday night, said that Davis "has had nothing to do" with the Homeownship Alliance since it disbanded and "I'll be glad to have his record examined by anybody who wants to look at it."

NB: The story was published in September, so "last month" means August.

After Isikoff, Maddow's second guest is Rosa Brooks, who among other things is a columnist for the Los Angeles Times and an long-time favorite of mine from BloggingHeads.tv. This clip is worth keeping keeping mind as we await the next round of shenanigans from John McCain and his campaign.

(alt. video link)

By the way, if you're cable- or TV-free like me, you might note that the hottest new thing on TV, The Rachel Maddow Show, has its own website. It's a little spare at the moment, lacking transcripts or easily navigable archives, but it's easy enough to watch the latest show, and it has an RSS feed to help remind you to do that. Worth checking out.

To think that I used to listen to her on the radio in a sleepy little town in western Massachusetts …

Legitimate Gloating

Paul Krugman keeps getting things right. Prominent wingnuts keep getting things wrong. Another in an ongoing series.

Obama in Nevada

Barack Obama, speaking in front of about 12,000 people at the University of Nevada in Reno, 30 Sep 2008.

A few minutes of this are the stump speech you might already be familiar with, and it's not as dramatic as the speech in the rain in Virginia this past Saturday. But there are some new parts where he speaks about the bailout rescue plan that might be of interest. If a speech can be low-key and inspiring at the same time, this is it. If it is possible for someone to bring this country together to get through the current economic crisis, this is who it will be.

(alt. video link)

(h/t: Jed Lewison)

Wait, I Forgot a Part

Remember that newspaper-readin' machine of a VP candidate mentioned earlier?

TBogg reminds us of Palin's college degree: journalism.

Up Next on Fox News: 2 + 2 = almost 97

Caught by Newshounds ("We watch FOX so you don't have to"):

(alt. video link)

John McCain: Man of "Honor"

The saga continues: another lying TV ad.

Remember: at the end of the ad comes the voiceover, "I'm John McCain and I approved this message."

(h/t: Steve Benen)

Duct Tape, Please!

From the latest segment of her interview with Katie Couric, She Who Would Be Vice President tackles the problem of anthropogenic global warming:

I'm not going to solely blame all of man's activities on changes in climate.

This is what happens when you try to memorize and regurgitate sound bites that contradict your actual beliefs.

(h/t: hilzoy)


[Added] Cenk Uygur of The Young Turks analyzes yet another clip, Palin speaking on Hamas. (Hint: choo-choo, smash smash.)

McCain's Ever-Eroding Base

Another member of the formerly fawning media finally wakes up. From Elizabeth Drew's How John McCain lost me, here's the first paragraph:

I have been a longtime admirer of John McCain. During the 2000 Republican presidential primaries I publicly defended McCain against the pro-Bush Republicans’ whisper campaign that he was too unstable to be president (aware though I was that he had a temper). Two years later I published a positive book about him, “Citizen McCain.”

And here's the last:

McCain’s recent conduct of his campaign – his willingness to lie repeatedly (including in his acceptance speech) and to play Russian roulette with the vice-presidency, in order to fulfill his long-held ambition – has reinforced my earlier, and growing, sense that John McCain is not a principled man.
In fact, it’s not clear who he is.

The ones in between are worth reading, too, as is the recommending source, Josh Marshall's Losing Everything.


[Added] Looks like Tom Brokaw is still firmly in the tank, though.

ShareThis