Tuesday, July 01, 2008

Nice Jugs

cardboard milk cartonIn my day, I've had many brushes with fame. Among others, I have an Erdös number of 3, I've been castigated by Robert Wright, and proving that it's always possible to be in the right place at the wrong time, I've been cursed out by Dr. John.

Here's maybe my favorite, though: I used to be close friends with a guy named Herb. Herb's grandfather invented the cardboard milk carton.

_____


Cory DoctorowThe cardboard milk carton, for those of you too young to know that eyeglasses with boxy black frames weren't always considered hip, was quite the breakthrough in its day.Matthew Yglesias My friend's family's fortune was built on it, affording them, among other things, the ability to buy a house with a mile and a half of waterfront property on Lake Placid. Rebecca WatsonThe daughter and son-in-law of the inventor -- Herb's parents -- were able to own and maintain this house without ever working a profitable day in their lives, devoting themselves instead to charitable work and the support of local artists. As one measure of their interests and wherewithal, they were able to indulge another of their children, Herb's older brother, in a momentary whim that involved dropping a piano from an airplane, just to watch it die make a movie of the event.

When I returned home and reported my new friendship with Herb to my father, he cursed Herb's grandfather. My father, otherwise a paragon of toleration, was one of many people who believed that civilization's decline began with the advent of this new container. carboard milk container with plastic pour spoutHe found it a wrestling match to open, a mess from which to pour, and completely unsatisfactory to re-close. Again, for our younger readers, beverage cartons did not always have that handy easy-opening, easy-closing, drip-free round pour spout built in to the sloping side of the carton. The idea was that the carton could be torn open in such a way that it formed its own pour spout. Opening the carton and forming the spout was not a skill that was universally mastered. There were even efforts to devise alternate techniques.

plastic milk jugFor this reason, and others, probably, the cardboard container did not long enjoy sole superpower status in the dairy section of grocery stores after it had vanquished the glass bottle. (True story: Milk used to be delivered only in glass bottles. Back when John McCain was a boy.) By the time Herb and I had moved on to other phases in life, milk began to be sold much more commonly in plastic jugs.

And there, it would seem, the story would have ended. The jugs had a comfortable handle and they were way easier to open. Pouring became less likely to provoke disaster at the breakfast table. One could even open a jug of milk, enjoy some of the contents, and close it so effectively that knocking over a half-filled jug did not produce so much as a drop of spilled milk. Children the world over rejoiced at no longer needing to be admonished for the pointlessness of their tears.

All this is by way of saying that I see by the New York Times that what seemed like the pinnacle of evolution for ways to contain one-gallon units of milk has been revealed to be just another in a series of local maxima. The new new best thing ever is this:

new plastic milk jug


According to the article:

The jugs are cheaper to ship and better for the environment, the milk is fresher when it arrives in stores, and it costs less.

The article explains that the cheaper shipping and environmental benefits derive from the new shape, which allows the containers to be stacked without first being put into milk crates. Since the crates no longer have to be used, this means they don't have to be picked up and trucked back to the farms. This in turn means the farms don't have to wash the crates (which, when waiting out back to be reused, are apparently favorite spots for birds to perch). Omitting this crate-washing step alone saves one dairy upwards of 60,000 gallons of water each day.

But wait, there's more! The benefits of crate-free stackability don't end there. Doing away with the crates means one truck can deliver much more milk per trip. Not only can the milk containers be packed closer together, but there's no need to reserve space in the truck at initial loading for picking up empty crates. Sam's Club stores, it is reported, have cut the number of required milk deliveries per week from five to two. All of this streamlining of the delivery process means milk gets from farm to store hours earlier, water and fuel are saved, and Sam can afford to charge you less. Major win!

There are, sadly, no silver clouds without dark linings. For one thing, I worry about what this implies for the long-range prospects of dorm room decor, although some smart people are already on the case. For another, the NYT reporter was able to find a few people who were unhappy about the shape of things to come, so unhappy that they were willing to go on the record to complain about difficulties in pouring from the new jugs. Some stores have even felt compelled to station employees near the coolers to demonstrate the new recommended technique.

Ah, well. We'll get used to it. I, for one, welcome our new, improved flat-topped jugs.

_____


I'm sorry. You read the title of this story and feel unfulfilled. You had every right not to expect me to use a cheap double entendre in a shameless attempt to attract one-handed Googlers without ultimately delivering. Any blogger who makes his readers suffer through an aimless post like this one, whose irritating stream of consciousness and exaggerations of fact are outweighed only by its over-reliance on mangled clichés, should not leave them hanging. Why, it practically violates Chekhov's Law.

Okay, then. Here is a link to a picture of a pair of beautiful tits.

_____


(pic. sources: Cory | Matt | Rebecca | old style cardboard milk carton | new style cardboard milk carton | old style plastic milk jug | new style plastic milk jug (screen grab from "audio slideshow") )

Monday, June 30, 2008

'Bout Time Someone Said So

Someone to whom the media will listen, anyway:

I don't think riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification to be president.
-- Gen. (ret.) Wesley K. Clark

I'm not looking for a Swiftboat-style attack on John McCain. I have no interest in trafficking in stories that allege that he was brainwashed by the Vietcong or that he turned traitor while in captivity or anything like that.

However, it has long irritated me that virtually no one in the MSM is capable of mentioning John McCain -- in any context -- without appending the words war hero. I respect the mindset that views military service as honorable and I admire his grit for surviving his years as a POW. But really, Wes Clark speaks the truth.

I thought Barack Obama put it nicely in a statement that some are sure to label as a non-apology apology (Clark is an Obama adviser):

For those like John McCain who have endured physical torment in service to our country, no further proof of such sacrifice is necessary.

Exactly. We're not questioning McCain's handling of himself during that time. But it did happen upwards of forty years ago, it's not like he's the only one who's ever gone through this, and in any case, it says nothing about his ability to be Chief Executive. The way that many pundits and even journalists refer to McCain, however, suggests that it happened last week, and that it serves as sufficient qualification for the job he now seeks.

There is also the sense in the phrase of an all-purpose Get Out Of Jail Free card. As soon as "war hero" is said, nothing more gets said about his history of shady land deals, his lack of understanding about economic or technological or environmental issues, his wish to continue the Bush policies on taxes and judicial appointments, his flip-flopping, the contradiction between his self-styled maverick image and the number of lobbyists who run his campaign, or the fact that his foreign policy views begin and end at the point of a bayonet.

So, good for Wes Clark for pointing out that what looks like a halo is really nothing more than a slightly elevated ring around the collar. And let me close by proposing that we should -- literally -- throw under the bus anyone who calls for Obama to throw Clark under the bus, or indeed, who even uses that most tiresome of political phrases.


[added] You really ought to have a look at Twin's follow-up remarks in the Comments. Thanks, Twin.

Sunday, June 29, 2008

In Which We Begin to Learn How Frustration Can Promote the Urge to Torture

Harry Shearer played some excerpts from John Yoo's testimony before Congress on the 29 June 2008 edition of Le Show. The whole program is well worth listening to, but if you're in a hurry, the lead-in to the Yoo bit starts at about 36:40 and the actual excerpts start at about 38:10 (Short commercial promotional message plays first, after which you'll see a slider.)

Saturday, June 28, 2008

23 Skid. Oooo.

The people have spoken.

Friday, June 27, 2008

Security Update: Adobe Reader, Adobe Acrobat

Adobe has released a security patch for Acrobat and Reader, for Mac and Windows.

You can get the update directly here, or use Help → Check for Updates from within the program. You'll need to be logged in as Administrator to see this menu option and to do the update in either case.

Krebs says to do it right away.

Iraq Update

Terry Gross interviewed NY Times Baghdad bureau chief James Glanz yesterday on Fresh Air. Well worth a listen.

Executive summary: You know how the Bush Administration has been telling us that things are now going great? Sorry to spring this on you, but not so much.

[added] Here's Glanz's recent piece that was mentioned in the interview: Government Study Criticizes Bush Administration’s Measures of Progress in Iraq.

[added] Jargon watch: Writing in a letter disputing the GAO's report, as noted in the article, the acting deputy assistant secretary of defense for the Middle East says that the Pentagon ...

... "nonconcurs" with the conclusion that a new strategy for stabilizing Iraq was needed.

I don't know which is more hilarious, his jargon or his job title.

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Why Flickr is Eating Our Lunch, Part 973

Just got the following by email from Kodak Gallery:

Dear Brendan,

Kodak Gallery appreciates the opportunity to serve you and we hope you'll continue to choose to keep your photos with us. Our Terms of Service require that you make at least one purchase from us every 12 months in order to maintain free storage of the photos in your account.

You need to make a purchase by July 25th 2008 to continue to enjoy free storage at the Gallery for another 12 months and to avoid deletion of your photos.

For a limited time you can save 25% on your purchase of $10 or more with coupon code: GET25NOW when you place an order.*

To maintain your free photo storage, simply sign in to your account and make a purchase today.

File under: Ain't Gonna Happen. See Ya!

Sunday, June 22, 2008

How Long Until Everyone on the Planet
Bookmarks ...

... this site?

I beg you: Use it. Don't abuse it.

(h/t: Joel Spolsky)

Saturday, June 21, 2008

Woo-hoo! No Woo!

I am almost always made impatient when people wax philosophical about science, particularly when a vague familiarity with a few aspects of quantum mechanics is put forth to "explain" free will, consciousness, changing the universe by changing your state of mind, and all manner of New Age woo. Therefore, when I make the following recommendation, you can be sure that I really found a striking exception.

This week's episode of "Science Saturday" on BloggingHeads.tv is a diavlog between theoretical physicist Sean Carroll and philosopher of science David Albert. A glance at my blogroll and through the archives shows how much I admire Sean.

I had not heard of David before today, but I found him fascinating to listen to. My affinity for him was enhanced right at the beginning of the diavlog, when he talked briefly about being sandbagged by the makers of the movie What the #$*! Do We (K)now!?. The moment that resonated most, though, is shown below. This half-minute clip is the kind of thing I wish I could hear more often from all philosophers:


If the above embedded video doesn't work, watch the clip here. But if you're at all interested in theoretical physics, or more broadly, in thinking about how we know what we know, you really should watch the whole thing.

By the way, you can read more about What the #$*! Do We (K)now!? on Salon. David is quoted on page 2 of this article. There's a good post about the movie on Skeptico, too.

And finally, if you have some more time, Sean's other appearances on BloggingHeads.tv are well worth watching, too.

Firefox 3: Make the Location Bar Yellow for Secure Sites

In Firefox 2, the background color of the location bar would turn yellow when you were at a secure site (one whose URL begins https://). By default, that is no longer the case in Firefox 3. If you want to bring back this behavior, see Lifehacker's Power User's Guide to Firefox 3.

The procedure involves adding some text to a configuration file called userChrome.css. If you don't have such a file in the expected location as Lifehacker's post describes, you probably have one called userChrome-example.css. Copy that to userChrome.css and modify as described in the LH post. Save the file, restart Firefox, and you should be see the changes the next time you visit a secure site. If you'd like to test the behavior right here, clicking the Comments link will do it.

Firefox 3: Awesome Bar Not So Awesome?

I let this loose in my first post about Firefox 3:

One minor gripe: The new location bar (where the URL of the website that you're visiting appears) is a bit busy for me, when I'm typing in a new URL. If you're the sort of person who types in URLs by hand, you may notice this, too. The old way that the location bar worked is that as one began typing, a drop-down menu would appear. The menu would list possible matches from your browsing history, based on the letters typed so far for the new URL.

Turns out there is an add-on, called oldbar, that will change the drop-down appearance back to the way it was in Firefox 2 (although the underlying algorithm remains the same). I haven't added it yet, since I'm not yet hating the new way, so this is mostly a note to self.

(h/t: Lifehacker's Power User's Guide to Firefox 3)

Friday, June 20, 2008

Firefox 3: Disappeaing Quick Edit Icon Problem Solved

I noted in a previous post that after installing Firefox 3, I could no longer see the "quick edit" icons (the pencil under the posts and the wrench/screwdriver under the sidebar items) while logged into and viewing my own blog. I have just solved my problem.

It turns out that Firefox 3 added a new privacy option (Tools → Options → Privacy tab), labeled "Accept third-party cookies." As installed on my system, possibly in accordance with settings from my previous installed version of Firefox 2, this box was unchecked. Checking this box makes the quick edit icons/links reappear.

IIRC, this specific privacy setting was in Firefox 1.x and was removed from Ffox 2.x. And now, apparently, it is back.

The unfortunate aspect to this is that in most cases, I do not want third-party cookies to be set. Ah, well. At least the technical problem has been cleared up.

BTW, the Blogger Help page that gave me the hint to look for this setting is here.

(This info cross-posted to the Blogger Help Group on Google Groups.)

I'm Dreaming of a New MSM

Swiped from the Evolutionary Middleman:

(alt. video link)

Thursday, June 19, 2008

Glenn Greenwald Interview of Jeff Cohen

Glenn Greenwald of Salon interviewed Jeff Cohen a few weeks ago. Here's an excerpt from the show page:

This morning, I interviewed Jeff Cohen, the former producer of the MSNBC show Donahue, which was canceled weeks before the invasion of Iraq despite being that network's highest rated show because, as a leaked NBC memorandum revealed, that network did not want to host an anti-war commentator -- not even a single one.

Cohen's comments, particularly as the interview progresses, are very illuminating regarding the corporate and political pressures at MSNBC at that time to promote only a pro-war, pro-Bush view. It's roughly 30 minutes long. The sound quality of the interview is quite good (we're continuously trying to improve sound quality) and Cohen makes many trenchant observations and reveals some very interesting facts about NBC, MSNBC, GE and its various on-air personalities. The interview can be heard here.

You may think the interview will do nothing more than confirm some of your suspicions, but it's well worth listening to, anyway. It is just astounding to what lengths the selling of the Iraq invasion went.

Firefox 3 and XPL LinkScanner Lite

Yesterday, I noted that the add-on XPL LinkScanner Lite was not compatible with Firefox 3. I heard back from support today. Here's the meat of the email:

We have added Firefox 3 support into LinkScanner and this is currently available in AVG Anti-Virus and Internet Security versions 8.0.125 and later. We do have plans to release an update to the older stand alone LinkScanner 2.7 to support existing customers. The update will contain support for Firefox 3. This is currently scheduled for release by the end of July. NOTE: When using LinkScanner Pro with Firefox 3 your online activities are still protected via active exploit and malsite blocking. Only the SearchShield functionality (search icons) is missing from Firefox 3.

Update (June 19th, 2008): An interm hotfix to add support for Firefox 3 is now planned for the week of June 30th. A full update to LinkScanner 2.7 is still planned for the end July.

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

Fiddling Ended

Regarding the last post, I have stopped fiddling around. Appearances should be back to normal. Please let me know if you see anything strange.

Pardon Our Appearance

If things look strange on this blog, it's because I'm fiddling with some layout settings, trying to debug a couple of glitches. Sorry for any inconvenience.

I'll add another post when I've stopped fiddling.

Security Notice: OpenOffice

OpenOffice, the free alternative to the Microsoft Office suite, has released a patch to close a security vulnerability that's being called "highly critical." This brings the latest version to 2.4.1. The vulnerability affects all versions of OO from 2.0 through 2.4. Details here. (Hat tip: Ryan Naraine.)

I downloaded and installed it. It went fine.

Some gripes, some of which I've noted before:

  • You can use Help → Check for Updates from within any OO program to get the new version. You have to be logged in as Administrator, however, even just to check for the update and to download it. I don't mind, much, having to log in as Administrator to install software, but I should at least be able to check for updates as a regular user. In fact, this a top priority for OO to address, and indeed, notification of the availability of security updates should be automatic, since smart computer users do not regularly work while logged in as Administrator.

  • Still no patch mechanism, which means the entire 127 MB installer has to be downloaded.

  • During the installation, OO launches your web browser to display some sort of "thank you" page. Later on in the installation, it pauses, saying it needs to make a change that requires you to close the browser. Later on still, it fires up the browser to display the same "thank you" page. I don't remember this happening before -- either one of the two different invocations of the browser or the "browser must be closed" hurdle smells like a bug in the installation program. Hard to believe this one got through testing. Could be a peculiarity of my system, conceivably, but it's hard for me to write it off that easily. My machine, I'd wager, is cleaner than most Windows boxes.

  • The installer unpacks files to a new folder during installation, but does not clean up after itself. Granted, the new folder is created, by default, on the Desktop, so it's easy enough to delete, but there is no reason why the standard installation procedure shouldn't delete this folder automatically at the end of the process. After all, there are several times during the looooooong installation process where the status window says something like "cleaning up" or "removing temporary files." Why not finish the job?

  • No matter what the previously installed version's settings were, OO insists on adding a "QuickLaunch" icon to the System Tray. This reflects yet another program that runs at start-up and never stops. Granted, it's probably a small program, and most people have more RAM than I do these days, but still. It should not do this without asking.

  • OO insists on adding a bunch of entries under the "New" entry in the Windows menu that you see when you right-click on the Desktop.

The bloat aspect -- no patch mechanism, meaning a complete download and install cycle is required just to close a security hole -- strikes me as lazy programming. So does the fact that there is no notification mechanism for updates available to non-Adminstrator accounts.

The last two gripes strike me as bad design -- I hate when programs insert themselves into all sorts of Windows nooks and crannies. It is not obvious to most regular users how to get rid of or disable these things; in fact, to clean up the "New" menu requires a separate utility. At minimum, both of these behaviors should be the sort of thing that the user is asked about upon installation of the program, and the default should be not to do them.

I like OO well enough for my limited word processing and spreadsheet needs, especially at the price, but I'm starting to like it less. Compare it to the new version of Firefox: Firefox's whole installer weighs in at 7 MB (about 5% the size of OO), I can install it and maintain it as a regular user, installation is polite and speedy and doesn't leave intermediate droppings behind, applying a security patch takes less than a minute from first being notified through the end of downloading, installing, and restarting, and so on. I get that a full office suite is more complex than a Web browser, but still, if Sun and OO.org don't get their act together on some of these things, they're going to lose yet another customer to the Borg Cloud.

Firefox 3: More on Add-ons and Minor Glitch Observations

I mentioned in my previous post that upon launching Firefox 3 for the first time, two of my add-ons were noted as incompatible, that no updates could be found, and so were disabled.

The first, Get Mail, which I use only so that CTRL-m will launch my email program from within Firefox, has an update available on the author's website. From previous communication, I recall that the author does not like the amount of hoops that Mozilla asks its add-on developers to jump through before they'll host an add-on and integrate it into the "Check for Updates" machinery. If you use this add-on, or want to find out more about it, visit the home page for the Get Mail Add-On for Firefox.

The second, XPL LinkScanner Lite, is a safe-surfing utility that scans websites for potential malware and other undesirable behaviors. It has never played within the standard Mozilla framework for add-ons, so I tried uninstalling the existing version, and downloading and installing the latest version. No soap. Firefox still thinks it's not compatible and keeps it disabled. The "console mode" for LinkScanner, accessible by double-clicking its icon in the Windows System Tray, still works -- among other things, this allows individual links to be checked by entering them by hand (or by paste). I have notified XPL of its add-on incompatibility, and if I hear back, I'll pass along whatever I learn.

As I mentioned in the last post, I also use another safe-surfing add-on, McAfee' SiteAdvisor. This utility adds a flag to the lower right corner of the browser that turns green (safe), yellow (warning), red (danger), or gray (no info) as you visit a new page. It also adds flags to the results returned by doing a Google (as John McCain might say). Find out more at the McAfee SiteAdvisor home page.

I have observed one minor glitch which may be of interest to those who run a Blogger blog: The "quick edit" link (the pencil icon), which allows for one-click editing of posts while viewing your own blog, is not appearing at the moment. I have confirmed that I'm logged in and that the appropriate setting is enabled in the Options. I have flushed the cache and restarted Firefox, and it still isn't there.

On a possibly related note, the icon to "Email this Post" is also not visible, although by hovering in the right area, it can be detected by the change in the cursor and the tooltip window that pops up. Clicking in this apparently blank area results in the correct behavior.

If I do a View → Page Source, I can see the code for both of these links where I'd expect it to be. I have no idea why neither icon appears, nor why one should invisibly work and the other not at all.

If any other Blogger users who are running Firefox 3 can weigh in on these in the Comments, I'd appreciate it. Do you see the same problem or not? I have posted this bug in the Blogger Help Group forums, and I'll pass along anything (else) that comes up. (So far, I have received one reply, which suggested that I check my scripting settings. I interpreted this to mean "make sure Javascript isn't disabled in the browser," and I have done that. No soap.)

Firefox 3 Released

Version 3.0 of Firefox is now available. Visit mozilla.com to get it.

Some quick notes based on my first impression:

  • You can't get the new version by using Help → Check for Updates, at least not right now. You must visit the site and click the big green download button.

  • The site is a little slow to respond right now, unsurprisingly, but not prohibitively so.

  • Download and installation proceeded without a hitch.

  • The new version will overwrite your existing version of Firefox, assuming you have one installed. This did not cause any problems for me. As far as I can tell, my settings were preserved; e.g., bookmarks and browsing history carried over, my existing choice of which toolbars to display and how to display them is correct, my non-default start page remains as specified, and so on. I don't use any skins or customization of this nature, so I can't say how that will work. Drop a note in the Comments if you experience something weird in this regard, please.

  • The out-of-the-box appearance of Firefox 3 is not greatly different from Firefox 2. The menus and keyboard shortcuts appear pretty much the same, which is a relief to those of use who like not to reach for the mouse. The icons in the navigation toolbar look new, but they're in the same positions.

  • The first time you start the new version of Firefox, you'll notice a short delay while it checks your add-ons for compatibility. If it finds any that are not compatible, it reports these and offers to look for updates. Add-ons for which incompatibilities exist and no updates can be found are disabled, with a promise from Firefox to check for such updates periodically in the future.

    Two add-ons that I use that had to be disabled: Get Mail, which basically adds the shortcut key CTRL-m to launch my email program, and XPL LinkScanner, a utility that checks websites for nastiness. I believe that both of these are non-standard add-ons, that Get Mail can be updated by an alternate method, and that the disabling of LinkScanner, as I use it, is a non-issue. I'll have more to say about this in my next post.

    Add-ons that I use that were not disabled by the the new version of Firefox: Flashblock, Image Zoom, McAfee SiteAdvisor, and PDF Download. Note that PDF Download did not offer an update when I first started the new version of Firefox, but it did, to v. 1.0.1.2, when I just clicked the "Find Updates" button in the Add-ons Manager (Tools → Add-ons). Could be that they just made one available in the hour or so that I've been playing with the new version.

So far, I have noticed only one tiny hiccup: the default installation procedure results in shortcut icons being added to the Windows Desktop and to the Windows Quick Launch toolbar. If you already have a Firefox shortcut on the Desktop, you may get a second one. I did already have a shortcut icon in the Quick Launch toolbar, and the installation added a second one. No problems were caused b deleting this or the one on the Desktop. My old Quick Launch shortcut still works, as does the shortcut I created in my customized Windows Start menu -- kudos to the Firefox team for this.

One minor observation: The default appearance of Firefox 3 means that the "back" button in the navigation toolbar is larger than the other button. If you have customized Firefox to specify smaller icons in the nav toolbar, this does not show up -- the back button is the same size as the other buttons. (I note this with happiness.)

One minor gripe: The new location bar (where the URL of the website that you're visiting appears) is a bit busy for me, when I'm typing in a new URL. If you're the sort of person who types in URLs by hand, you may notice this, too. The old way that the location bar worked is that as one began typing, a drop-down menu would appear. The menu would list possible matches from your browsing history, based on the letters typed so far for the new URL.

The new approach preserves this behavior, but also adds to the list matches from the titles of previously visited pages. The display, consequently, is more cluttered. The old version displayed a list of URL, one per line, all in the same font. In the new version, each candidate entry now takes up two lines. The first is the title of the page, the second is the URL for that page. The URL appears in a smaller font.

This could be something that everyone except me likes from the get-go. It irritates me because if I'm typing a URL, I am thinking of URLs, not page titles, so I'd prefer to see only URLs as candidates for completion. In the rare case that I'm trying to recall a previously-viewed page by keywords in its title, well, that's what CTRL-h is for, right?

I expect that I'll get used to it, but it's annoying that I can't flick a switch in about:config to restore the old behavior.

[added] Oh, one more minor observation: In what must be connected to the developers' love for their new location bar, the History appears to be set to 90 days by default. I had mine set to 10 days, I believe, but I can't swear to it. Since there does not appear to be any penalty for leaving the (new?) default setting as is, I guess I will.

Overall, no complaints. The claim is that the new version is slimmer and speedier. It does feel that way to me. There are bunches of improvements described on Mozilla's FAQs, Features, Tips & Tricks, and Release Notes pages that I have still to look at.

In the meantime, while I'm working on my next post about the disabled add-ons, feel free to share any new goodness that you've come across.

Shameless rah-rah-ism and a cool interactive map here:

Download Day - English

As of this moment, Firefox 3 has been downloaded 1,091,511 times from the US. Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Spain, and the UK all show about 100K downloads.

Iran is already up to 58,294. China (77,086), Russia (32,905), and India (15,835) are all surprisingly low, but I'm thinking time zone differences are at work here. (I explain away Iran with absolutely no evidence by asserting that this coffee-loving, teetotaling nation is filled with night owls.)

Some also-rans: Greenland: 28, Afghanistan: 38, Iraq: 82, Nepal: 146, Cuba: 513, Sri Lanka: 656.

Israel: 7583. Palestinian Territories: 95.

South Korea: 17,872. North Korea: 0.

Saturday, June 14, 2008

E Pluribus Unum, v2.0

If you're interested in this sort of thing, IEEE's Spectrum has put together a special report on the coming Singularity. There are articles and videos, featuring both optimists and skeptics. I haven't gone through it yet, but it looks good.

On a related note, John Horgan, a science writer and skeptic about all this, interviewed and debated a leading proponent, Eliezer Yudkowsky, on BloggingHeads.tv's Science Saturday, last week.

Friday, June 13, 2008

Neologism of the Day: 2008-06-13

I think I saw this mentioned somewhere else a day or two ago, but as I've just happened across the original source, now I really have to note it.

Can you guess the definition before you click the link?

John Scalzi introduces ... nerdgassing!

I love it.

Thursday, June 12, 2008

The Mouse Who Roared

Remember my post about the lion? With the video showing one of the Factor toadies who tried to ambush Bill Moyers getting pwned?

Unsurprisingly, the all mouth and no spine Bill O'Reilly has his own version of the video, complete with selective editing. Oh, and yet another paid sycophant to help with his self-reassurance:

(alt. video link)

"It doesn't matter what he says," says the Falafel Master. Which, I guess, is why he quickly stopped the tape before his viewers could hear for themselves.

I used to get annoyed at this blowhard. Now I just feel sorry for him.

(h/t: DJ)

Not for the first time in my life, I am not proud of my country

Hello, dolly.

Hey, baby.

(h/t: Jesse Taylor, via bean)


Oliver is not happy, either. Nor is Brad.

Wednesday, June 11, 2008

Mistaking Self-Importance for Importance

On another note, I've received zero reach out from the Obama team, which is their prerogative to do or not, but it's a mistake.
-- Taylor Marsh

MSM Love for McCain Rages On

This time, it's Chuck Todd in denial.

600!

I don't follow baseball much anymore, but I always did like Ken Griffey, Jr. Sports writer and blogger extraordinaire Joe Posnanski, on occasion of Junior's milestone, reminds me of why.

(h/t: MetsGrrl, via Scott Lemieux)

__________


[Update 2010-09-25 Old link changed to point to Joe's new home online.]

A Small Sign of Hope

KO > BillO!

Evolving Thoughts

Even if you think you've absolutely, positively read the last thing you're going to read about the Democratic primary contest, you should still read "Ask Not What Your Country Can Do For You ..." by John Rogers.

Notice the mood change as the essay progresses. It's exactly what happens to me whenever I try to talk about the situation he describes.

To help ease the anger, though, be sure afterwards to follow his link within, labeled "Crazification Factor," which points to another post of his from about two and a half years ago. Not only will it remind you what's really at stake come November, it's hilarious. Plus, it explains the deep significance of "27%." (But save it for dessert. Trust me on this.)

ShareThis