Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Report from the US Prison Industrial Complex

I have known for some time that the way the game is rigged these days is that if you don't take a prosecutor's plea bargain offer, and instead insist upon your Constitutional right (quaint!) to a trial by jury, you risk extremely harsh punishment if you lose at trial. But I did not know it was quite this bad:

The Supreme Court ruled in 1978 that threatening someone with life imprisonment for a minor crime in an effort to induce him to forfeit a jury trial did not violate his Sixth Amendment right to trial. Thirteen years later, in Harmelin v. Michigan, the court ruled that life imprisonment for a first-time drug offense did not violate the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment.

Bad as that is, here's an example of how it gets worse:

No wonder, then, that most people waive their rights. Take the case of Erma Faye Stewart, a single African-American mother of two who was arrested at age 30 in a drug sweep in Hearne, Tex., in 2000. In jail, with no one to care for her two young children, she began to panic. Though she maintained her innocence, her court-appointed lawyer told her to plead guilty, since the prosecutor offered probation. Ms. Stewart spent a month in jail, and then relented to a plea. She was sentenced to 10 years’ probation and ordered to pay a $1,000 fine. Then her real punishment began: upon her release, Ms. Stewart was saddled with a felony record; she was destitute, barred from food stamps and evicted from public housing. Once they were homeless, Ms. Stewart’s children were taken away and placed in foster care. In the end, she lost everything even though she took the deal.

Read the whole article to learn about a novel solution proposed by a brave woman named Susan Burton.

2 comments:

bjkeefe said...

DR. PAUL WILL SAVE US ALL.

bjkeefe said...

Probably I'm going to regret, someday, not putting a winkie after that previous comment.

Let's hope chiwhi never sees it!

ShareThis