Showing posts sorted by relevance for query franken. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query franken. Sort by date Show all posts

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Franken for Senator!

Joshua Green did a nice multimedia profile of Al Franken for The Atlantic earlier this month. As you may or may not know, Franken is running, in Minnesota, for the U.S. Senate this November, against the incumbent, Republican Norm Coleman. When Franken announced his candidacy, he wasn't taken particularly seriously, but he has since moved well ahead of other Democratic contenders for the nomination, voting for which takes place on 7 June. Recent polls also show him closing in on Coleman, who has been viewed for some time now as one of the most vulnerable incumbents in the Senate.

I have liked Franken, and considered him far more than a comedian, ever since I read Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right. As funny as the book was, it was also a serious and thoroughly researched critique of the right-wing noise machine.

You can read Green's article here and watch the video here. You can also download the video, or just the audio portion of it, from the iTunes store. Search for "The Atlantic: American Ideas." Both are free.

If you get really inspired, you might also visit Al Franken's official campaign site.

I'll leave you with this parting thought, straight from the candidate's mouth, via the video page linked to above:

A satirist looks at a situation and sees the inconsistencies and hypocrisies, and he cuts through the baloney and gets to the truth. I think that’s pretty good training for the Senate, don’t you?

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Had 'em all the way

Here's the lede from the Strib:

Court rules for Franken; Coleman won't appeal

Republican Norm Coleman ended his bruising eight-month court fight over Minnesota's U.S. Senate seat this afternoon, conceding to Democrat Al Franken after the Minnesota Supreme Court ruled in Franken's favor.

The justices ruled today that Franken won the U.S. Senate election and said he is entitled to an election certificate that would lead to him being seated in the Senate.

"Affirmed," wrote the Supreme Court, unanimously rejecting Coleman's claims that inconsistent practices by local elections officials and wrong decisions by a lower court had denied him victory.

Two hours after the decision was released, Coleman said he would "abide by the results."

"Furtrher litigation damages the unity of our state," he said during a news conference held at his St. Paul home. "The future today is that we have a new United States senator."

Coleman said he had called Franken to "congratulate him for his victory. I told him it's the best job he will ever have."

In the words of Jed Bartlet, what's next?

(h/t: Wonkette)



[Added] More in the next post.

Sunday, July 25, 2010

Senator Franken Rocks The House

Al FrankenAt Netroots Nation 2010 (#nn10), at least as far as Twitter tells me.

Examples from some of the people I follow, seen before I thought to do the above search (some are retweets, via the very helpful @sonjablair).

RyanNewYork:

Thanks to @AlFranken for a wonderful closing speech to #NN10 and for being a champion for Net Neutrality! #P2 #Tech

AdamSerwer:

who would have thought that sen. @alfranken would have become one of the biggest champions of progressive legal philosophy?

Emperor_Bob:

RT @ddayen: Franken: Your rights are disappearing one 5-4 Supreme Court decision at a time #nn10

wonkroom:

RT @newleftmedia: Al Franken: Republicans talk about deficits as if deficits appeared, all-the-sudden, at noon January 20, 2009.

elonjames:

“@brownboyrocks: 'No matter how frustrated you are don't stop now.' - @AlFranken #nn10”

(pic. source | x-posted)




And meanwhile, what do you suppose Al Franken's erstwhile opponent was up to?)

Friday, April 06, 2012

Al Franken wins the Internet

At least, in the category of Emails From Politicians Seeking Contributions.

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

More Franken!

Following up on the last post …

How's this for a news angle that might not have immediately leapt to mind?

There are now more Jews in the Iranian parliament than there are Jewish Republicans in the U.S. Senate (it's a tie when you count all of Congress)...

No lie: this was near the top of the Google News results, at this moment.

__________


Summary of the Minnesota State Supreme Court's ruling and a link to the full PDF of the decision are available on MinnPost.

__________


[2009-06-30 17:17:17] Al Franken is at the top of the list for Twitter's "Trending Topics" at this moment. Sorry, Michael Jackson.

__________


[2009-06-30 17:19:53] Oh, and that timestamp above is real (keyboard macro). A good sign! (If you retroactively claim 17 as your lucky number, as I do.)

__________


[2009-06-30 17:24:14] LAT's Top of the Ticket headline:

Recount Day 238: Coleman quits; Goshdarnit Al Franken's a senator

Holy crap. 238 days. Even as long as it feels like it's been, that really brings it home.

(Of course you noticed that 238 is an integer multiple of 17, right? Good. Just checking.)

__________


[2009-06-30 17:43:10] Another piece of (completely unrelated) good news: Firefox 3.5 has been released. Get it here. I will be doing the upgrade shortly, after I stop doing CTRL-r on Google News results for Franken.

__________


[2009-06-30 17:56:48] Via Atrios, MPR reports:

In a statement, Gov. Tim Pawlenty said he will sign the election certificate later this afternoon.

__________


More in the next post.

Friday, January 29, 2010

We Shouldn't Forget

Jamie Leigh Jones

According to Jones, just four days after she arrived in Baghdad, she joined a small group of Halliburton firefighters outside the KBR barracks. One gave her a drink. She took two sips, after which she can recall nothing. In legal filings and congressional testimony, Jones describes waking up the next morning "still affected by the drug," and discovering "her body naked and severely bruised, with lacerations to her vagina and anus, blood running down her leg, her breast implants ruptured and her pectoral muscles torn‚ which would later require reconstructive surgery."

According to Jones, a rape kit was administered at an Army-run hospital. The rape kit was then handed over to KBR, and since then bits of it have disappeared as it came into the custody of various agencies until reaching its current resting place with the U.S. Department of State. Jones also alleges that after her rape-kit procedure was performed, KBR placed her under armed guard in a shipping container for at least 24 hours and refused to let her eat, drink, or call her family. For reasons that have never been entirely clear, the Department of Justice declined to investigate. Jones eventually refused to arbitrate this case in a private forum in which Halliburton paid for the arbitrator and in which there was no right to appeal.

She sued in federal court in 2007, and in September, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision allowing Jones to press some of her claims in civil court as opposed to private arbitration. Because her assault was not connected to her employment, the court said, it was not subject to the mandatory arbitration clause she had signed.

Last week KBR/Halliburton asked the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse this ruling. In its petition—which accuses Jones of being dishonest as well as a publicity seeker—KBR gives a whole new meaning to the politics of blaming the victim. As Stephanie Mencimer of Mother Jones pointed out Monday, KBR isn't above accusing Jamie Leigh Jones of being a liar who has "has gone to great lengths to sensationalize her allegations against the KBR Defendants in the media, before the courts, and before Congress."

Evidently KBR is still smarting from Sen. Al Franken's amendment to the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, which withholds defense contracts from companies that "restrict their employees from taking workplace sexual assault, battery and discrimination cases to court." That measure passed the Senate in December, with 30 Republicans voting against it. President Obama signed it into law.

Those same 30 male Republican senators who voted against the Franken amendment learned the hard way that it's never smart politics to try to lock Jamie Leigh Jones in a closet. They were mystified by the blowback last fall. David Vitter of Louisiana, for example, was confronted at a town hall meeting by a devastated rape victim. (Vitter blamed President Obama and walked away). John Thune of South Dakota tried to say the Franken amendment was a "politically inspired amendment" that aimed to do away with arbitration in labor agreements. Then John Cornyn of Texas whined about how the evil Franken was "trying to tap into the natural sympathy that we have for this victim of this rape—and use that as a justification to frankly misrepresent and embarrass his colleagues." It takes a special kind of narcissist to say a victim of gang rape isn't suffering as much as the embarrassed senators who voted against her.

Read the rest of Dahlia Lithwick's righteous piece.

(h/t: Steve Benen)

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

Joe Lieberman Would Probably Like Norm Coleman To Win ...

... so he can let the new guy take a turn being the Senate's most sanctimonious prick.

AdNag has a piece in the NYT on the consequences of the endless delaying tactics being used by Coleman to prevent Al Franken from taking the Senate seat that Franken long ago won. In the article, Franken talks about trying to do the parts of his job that he can do right now, while waiting for Republican Governor Pawlenty to grow a spine and do what's right. By contrast, Coleman just trowels it on:

He said that every morning, he puts tefillin — black leather boxes containing scrolls — on his arm as part of a morning Jewish prayer ritual. “I bind myself every morning,” he said. “I bind myself to God every morning because it’s in his hands.”

He paused. “David Letterman will make fun of me for this,” he said.

Spare us the weepy helpless lamb act and the cringing before the imagined persecution from the evil secular comedian. You've been more than willing to lie and cheat to try to steal this election for going on half a year now.

And look, Holy Norm, you blew it. You were a Bush toady, you refused to take your opponent seriously, you lost the recount, and you've lost every time you've gone to court to argue about it. Matter of fact, the latest decision only increased the margin by which you lost. So show us that there's some grain of sincerity to your piety act: take these as signs from your God and step aside.

Monday, January 05, 2009

Why We Like Al Franken: Another In An Ongoing Series

While looking for election results, I came across 72 seconds of footage shot in March 2007. Don't be alarmed by the first face you see.

(alt. video link)

Sample wingnut reaction (from this past August):

Clips of his debate with Coulter show Franken choosing Hitler as the famous figure he’d most like to have been. He promptly adds that he could thereby prevent the Holocaust, but it is doubtful Franken would take that context into account if Coulter had made the statement.
-- Kathy Shaidle, FrontPageMag

Seriously, wingnuts see different things. And no, they do not get jokes.

Kathy Shaidle may be better known by her blog title: Five Feet of Fury. Perhaps that rings a bell? Happily, Yes!

Is she on The List? She will be momentarily!

(h/t: Paul Schmelzer)

Friday, June 06, 2008

And Now, Your Moment of Give Me a Fucking Break Already

TPM Election Central headline:

Franken Apologizes For Writing "Porn-O-Rama" Essay In Playboy.

Eight years ago, mind you.

Up next: Franken forced to dismiss campaign worker who says "Shit!" after hitting his thumb with a hammer.

The limitless supply of feigned outrage in this country, and not just from Republicans, never fails to amaze me. I can only hope this post's title draws some of it.

If you feel like being more mature and constructive about this than I have just been, you can donate to his campaign at AlFranken.com.

Franken's reply, included in the post under the above headline, is pretty good. (He said as he calmed down a little bit).

Wednesday, July 08, 2009

Takes One to Know One, I Guess

From his home state paper, no less:

One week after calling him "the clown from Minnesota," Sen. Jim Inhofe shared a hug Tuesday with Al Franken, the newly minted senator from the North Star State.

That didn't stop Inhofe from saying Franken "kind of looked like a clown."

Below, the Senator best known for asserting that people concerned about global warming are Nazis:

Sen. James Inhofe, (R-Clown)

Image from Hebiclens / WMxdesign, whom you may remember from a previous post.

(h/t: Sara K. Smith/Wonkette)

P.S. And speaking of clowns, let it never be said that Bill O'Reilly has reached the ultimate limit in self-pity. He will always find a new low. Having to have a shill on to comfort him about Barney Frank's mean ol' body language? Kee-rist.

Friday, May 20, 2011

That Al Franken is a pretty smart guy, isn't he?

Remember the email from Sen. Franken that I re-posted yesterday? Remember how he said this, among other things?

The sky is blue. The world is round. Two plus two equals four. These are truths. Here's another one: Net neutrality isn't a government takeover of anything -- in fact, it protects the Internet from a corporate takeover.

And what do we learn in today's news?

Why, that it's perfectly fine if the government takes over the Internet, provided by "the government" we mean "the GOP and their corporate donors!" (Especially when they're afraid of competition!)

IOKIYAR. IOKIYAR. Always and forevermore, IOKIYAR.

(x-posted)

Tuesday, September 08, 2009

Knows a bit about geography

Minnesota Public Radio, via HuffPo, says this is real -- a party trick that Senator Al Franken has done before -- and that you'd hear oohs and aahs from the crowd were it not for the musical soundtrack. Seems to me there are just enough small errors to make that plausible. If you believe it's real, the details and proportions are pretty amazing.

(alt. video link)

[Added] More reason to believe: via KK and the "related" feature on YouTube, you can see Franken do this (not quite as well) on David Letterman, way back in 1987. (Jump to about 6:35 if you don't want to watch the whole clip, but it is worth watching.)

[Update 2015-10-16 14:14] New embed code for video.

Tuesday, July 08, 2008

Feeling Minnesota

Michael Kinsley has a nice piece up on Slate about Al Franken. He asks, in this age of the never-ending quest to find the next thing to be offended by, whether some of Franken's old jokes will kill his chances of winning.

Me, I'm as sick of feigned outrage as I am of anything these days. But you probably already knew that.

Tuesday, July 27, 2010

Nice to see at least ONE Democrat isn't cowed

Way to stick to it, way to stick with it, Senator Franken.

screen shot: Al Franken's slogan from his home page: 'Change we can believe in'


Never let the right-wing noise machine make you ashamed of your own words, or more importantly, your own beliefs.

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Sen. Al Franken's Latest Email on Net Neutrality

Al Franken - U.S. Senator, Minnesota

Brendan --

The sky is red. The world is flat. And two plus two equals pancakes.

These statements aren't just false -- they're downright ridiculous. And so is the claim that net neutrality amounts to a government takeover of the Internet.

Let's get this straight: Net neutrality isn't a change -- it's the status quo. It's the way the Internet operates right now: free and open. And it isn't the government that's attempting an Internet "takeover" -- it's the big corporations who want to undermine net neutrality and the Republicans who want to let them.

It's important that everyone we can talk to DOES know the truth -- because this anti-Internet-freedom, pro-corporate-takeover legislation is coming to the Senate.

I'm asking you to make a commitment to standing up for truth, logic, and the free and open Internet by clicking here and taking action to help us get the truth out.

  • Forward this email to five friends
  • Share what we're doing in this fight on Facebook or Twitter
  • Add our campaign as your instant messenger status
  • Tell at least three other friends the real story of net neutrality -- no clicking required!

The sky is blue. The world is round. Two plus two equals four. These are truths. Here's another one: Net neutrality isn't a government takeover of anything -- in fact, it protects the Internet from a corporate takeover.

And here's one more truth: It'll only stay that way if we stand together and fight back against misinformation. Will you take a few minutes today and help save the Internet?

Al



(x-posted)

Friday, January 28, 2011

Al Franken not giving up on Net Neutraility

Good for him, and good for Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA). See Al Franken's blog or Reclaim the Media for the latest.

When considering the importance of keeping the Internet from being controlled by ever fewer, ever more powerful interests, you might reflect on the situation in Egypt. See recent posts by Don McArthur and James Cowie. Yes, the US is not Egypt. But the time to push back against the desire for totalitarian control is now, not when matters get worse.

[Added] These connections are already tighter than you might think.

[Added2] Correction: I had Sen. Cantwell's first name wrong in the original post. It is Maria, not Patricia. Thanks to Paul Chadwick for noting this in the Comments.

Saturday, September 13, 2008

Yeah, I Watched Part 2

If you missed it on TV, the second part of Sarah Palin's interview with Charles Gibson, which aired last night, is available on ABC's site. (And probably elsewhere, by now.)

My reaction: not a whole lot of there there, both as applied to the candidate and the interview. Gibson did an okay job, I thought. Many of my cohorts, by which I mean people who are informed enough to realize that four more years of Republican incompetence may well bury this country, will no doubt have wished that he'd pressed her more or addressed other issues. In the end, though, there is only so much one can expect of a single interview if the news organization is concerned about appearing balanced and not playing gotcha, and the interviewee is disciplined enough to stick to rehearsed talking points prepared for easily anticipated questions.

I thought Gibson did enough to show Palin for who she is. She neither fell on her face (as she did in the first part) nor shone. I expect that most people will only come away from watching the second part with their earlier impressions reinforced -- they'll either believe more strongly that she's not ready for prime time about as unprepared to be Vice President as one could possibly imagine, or they'll be happy that the nice person next door can hold her own when being "attacked" by the "media elite."

Palin sounded to me like John McCain -- a lot of slogans that weren't even complete sentences, and a lot of not answering the questions and not even doing that artfully. She displayed a good dose of petulance when she was pressed on the things she's been lying about, like the Bridge to Nowhere. She sounded downright defensive about Troopergate and the book censoring issue.

I thought she sounded like she had no idea of the proportions involved when she was going on and on about cutting earmarks and other "cost-savings" plans. I would like to believe that John McCain is aware, deep down, that this big idea of campaigning against earmarks is bogus. Despite the howlers that get all the media play, like the Bridge to Nowhere, much of the funding goes to programs that are useful, and in any case, the total outlay is a few drops in the bucket compared to what else the government spends money on (e.g.). However, given the McCain I've seen lately, I have my doubts about this, too.

Palin was pretty good on abortion and stem cells. Obviously, I think her views on these issues are wrongheaded, but I thought at least she sounded most like her real self there. Not completely honest, but politician-honest.

I continue to be put off by her saying "nuke-yular." It's a minor thing, but it's a powerful symbolic reminder of the Current Occupant. Given how hard the McCain campaign is trying to run away from Bush (while not actually differing in any substantive policy sense), I wonder if her coaches tried to fix this (as they did the first time she was on the national stage). I cannot shake the feeling, though, that her mangling of the word is part of her image package, that she and her handlers have put all their money on appealing to that group of Americans who proudly embrace their ignorance.

The next "interview" planned for Palin will be conducted by Sean Hannity, a man principally employed to convey the impression that Bill O'Reilly is a journalist and a human being capable of staying on an even keel. Donklephant says he'll do it alone; i.e., the sidekick Al Franken correctly calls Holmes will not attend. I expect the hardest-hitting question will be along the lines of "How do you stay so awesome in fending off the Russian invasion of Alaska and single-handedly eliminating every penny of wasteful government spending in the face of the radical-liberal-secret-Muslim-terrorist-loving-lipstick-hating attacks on your beautiful children?"

So, between this and the previous post, I think I'm done talking about Sarah Palin. I'll pass along good snark if I find it, but other than that, I think my time will be better served searching for discount prices on bulk lots of booze.

Although, come to think of it, there are probably better uses for my dollars.

Friday, March 13, 2009

Pork This

While double-checking the link for the rant just posted, I noticed that a little bit of good stuff continues to sneak past the editors at Slate.

Go Tim Noah!

Why the GOP Should Shut Up

Six out of the top 10 Senate earmark hogs are Republicans.

[...]

No fewer than six out of these 10 senators are Republicans, including the two top earmark hogs, Cochran and Wicker. Cochran, Wicker, Bond, and Shelby at least had the decency to vote for the bill after they stuffed it with earmarks. Vitter and Grassley followed [Senate Minority Leader Mitch] McConnell's hypocritical lead, inserting earmarks but then voting against the final bill, knowing it would pass anyway. Norm Coleman (R-Minn.), who because of a legal dispute over election results doesn't even have a Senate seat and isn't likely to recover it in court, nonetheless managed to rank in the top third of earmark hogs with a haul of $109 million. His Democratic opponent and the likely victor, Al Franken, got none.

Remember this next time you hear Republicans piss and moan about Democrats' spendthrift ways.

Will The MaverickTM be Twittering about this, one wonders? [Added: When he's not too busy get-offing-my-lawn about really stupid shit, I mean.]

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Even More Franken!

One of my bookmarked bookmarks ...

TS said this on 16 December 2008:

TS's Bookmarks.

I'm keeping this on ice. With the champagne.

Break it out!

Since Kathryn Jean Lopez has kinda sorta been fired between then and now, maybe we'd better have a screen grab, just in case:

We who laugh last ...

Saturday, January 03, 2009

Right On, Too

In light of the previous post, read Roy Edroso's latest, in particular, the part about Al Franken.

ShareThis