Tuesday, February 22, 2011

The Republican War on Women Continues

Two reports from Georgia.

In summary: (1) women who report being raped or assaulted are not to be trusted, and (2) women who have miscarriages are to be presumed guilty of self-induced abortions until proven innocent.

Sure, Bobby Franklin is an extreme case. But is he unique to the point where the mainstream GOP, such as it is, will scorn him, or does he serve their interests by pushing the Overton Window that much farther to the right?

(h/t: Scott Lemiuex | x-posted | title: cf.)

Crony capitalism? Or just plain robber barons run amok?

Check out what else the Koch-puppet "governor" of Wisconsin is up to. Nice catch, Ed.

Further commentary on this stealth maneuver from Mike Konczal at Rortybomb.

(x-posted)

Monday, February 21, 2011

Quantifying the Bedwetting

It will come as no shock to learn that people who watch FoxNews are generally more terrified of Teh Muslin Menniss (among many other things) than everyone else. But now, thanks to Public Religion Research, we have some specific measurements.

As you may or may not know, Sen. Joseph McCarthy Rep. Peter King (R-NY) is planning to hold hearings, starting 7 March, on how hard we should freak out about the supposed threat from "radicalized" American Muslims and their plans to murder the rest of us. According to PRR's survey, nearly two-thirds of Americans say they haven't heard anything about this. However, of those who say "Fox is their most trusted news source," 40% have.

Further:

• Republicans who say Fox News is their most trusted news source are more likely than Republicans who trust a different news source [Such people actually exist? --ed.] to say they are well-informed about Islam (53% to 34%). They are also more likely than Republicans who most trust other news sources to say the hearings are a good thing (82% to 60%).

• White evangelicals who most trust Fox News are much more likely than those who trust a different news source to say they feel informed about Islam than those who trust other sources of news (70% to 37%). This same group of evangelicals is also more likely than their counterparts who most trust other news sources to say the hearings are a good thing (84% to 60%).

• More than three-quarters (76%) of those who most trust Fox News say it is a good idea [to hold the hearings] compared to only 45% of those who most trust CNN and 28% of those who most trust Public television.

• Those who most trust Fox News are twice as likely as those who most trust Broadcast news and about four times as likely those who most trust public television to believe ["Muslims want to establish Shari’a law as law of the land"] (35%, 18% and 9%)

Further observations from Pareene.

(pic. source)

Romney = Excitement!

Just ask John McCain!

Pic from The Saccharinist, via Pareene, but neither of those actually has anything to do with excitement generated by Willard. Such a post could not be written.*



* K-Lo doesn't count.

Must be a pile of money nearby ...


... or maybe I just think that because she's apparently telling those who still read her Facebook page that "everyone" needs to "sacrifice."

It's no surprise that someone so smug about her own ignorance thinks public school teachers should just bend over and take whatever the Koch puppet Scott Walker wants to give them, but seeing Sarah Palin speak of "real solidarity" to her "union brothers and sisters" makes me throw up in my mouth a little.

An Oddly Compelling Image


(embiggen)

Photo by M. Bouffant. More at the link.

Slow Grind Finally Ends Well

Remember Mark A. Ciavarella, Jr. and Michael T. Conahan from a couple of years ago? Those two scumbag judges who made millions in kickbacks by sending kids to a for-profit juvenile detention center? Good news: they've finally been convicted.

I suppose I should not say "ends." Their sorry asses aren't in jail yet. Soon, one hopes.

(h/t: M. Bouffant)

Sunday, February 20, 2011

Some day when I grow up ...

... I'll be able to write like this: "a skeptic is an activist who’s been mugged by the HuffPo wellness section."

And that's just the title. It is a truly wonderful blog post.

[Added] I see that the target of the ire has responded in comments under that post. "Breezy," hmmm? Way better than stagnant, that's for sure.

Drinking Sharron Angle's Lemonade

Not from The Onion:

A Montana legislator is proposing the state embrace global warming as good for the economy.

Republican Rep. Joe Read of Ronan aims to pass a law that says global warming is a natural occurrence that "is beneficial to the welfare and business climate of Montana."

(h/t: Matt Yglesias | title: cf. | x-posted)

[Added] Wonk Room scored an interview with this clown. Among other revelations:

... the 55-year-old first-time legislator graciously explained why he filed this bill to outlaw science, which even he admitted was a “radical” act. Unlike the man who tried to get the Indiana legislature to redefine pi for a crank mathematical “proof” in 1897, Read’s motivation is primarily ideological. Read did not consult any climate scientists in the drafting of this bill, he said, relying instead on his own experience and understanding of the issues at play:

Read also explained why he chose to write a set of scientific conclusions into law that go against the last 150 years of climate research and the political consensus of every government in the world:

Sometimes you have to do fairly radical things to address a federal government.

Spoken like a real Commensense Conservative™.

Men after my own heart

Wolcott gets a cry for help from Amis:

It is a measure of the stress Martin is under that his email contains a minor grammatical error, which shook me to my core.

(previously)

How to Identify a Meth Lab

(h/t: KK, via email)

The Consequences of Unplanned Parenthood

A shocking report on The Enemy Within:

(alt. video link)

Fight toddler coddlers!

(h/t: Ocean, via email)

I guess it all depends on what your definition of "standard" is

From a report on HarperCollins's plans for a new division dedicated to telling the wingnuts what they want to hear:

“What I intend to do is uphold a standard of intellectual seriousness on the right,” Mr. Bellow said.

Uh huh. But it gets better, three paragraphs earlier:

As Mr. Bellow imagines it, Broadside Books (“it had a certain combative edge,” he said of the title) will publish books on the culture wars, books of ideas, books of revisionist history, biographies, anthologies, polemical paperbacks and pop-culture books from a conservative point of view.

One does have to appreciate, however, that the head of a company seeking to prey on the KEEP YOUR GOVERNMENT HANDS OFF MY MEDICARE!!!1! set is named Bellow.

(h/t: Frank Rich, whose column today is well worth reading in its entirety. And not just for the dish about the plummeting fortunes of Beck, Palin, and for that matter, Broadside Books.)

Saturday, February 19, 2011

Good thing the Teabaggin' GOP is all about jobs!

Oh, wait ...

The House vote to end Planned Parenthood funding would make very little sense — in some alternate universe where people who want to criminalize abortion were primarily concerned about protecting fetal life rather than regulating female sexuality. In our actually existing political universe, it makes perfect sense.

Back to the 19th century, with today's Republican Party! Do you not love your American Taliban and their own brand of sharia law?

If you're interested, Planned Parenthood has an open letter to Congress and a petition for you to sign.

(x-posted)

What is that, Bristol Palin's new campaign poster?

Over at Mr. Riley's place.

Remember that Charles and David's last name doesn't rhyme with "crotch"

Non-Wisconsin resident TBogg for the win:


Sordid details here and here.

Huh. I didn't know that.

I just happened across a mention by Amanda Terkel of a $1 million donation by George Soros to Media Matters. This happened just a few months ago. This was the first time Soros has ever given money to Media Matters.

???!!!

NYT Caucus blog, 20 Oct 2010:

In an accompanying statement, Mr. Soros, a billionaire who has a history of supporting liberal politicians and causes, accused Fox News hosts of “incendiary rhetoric” and said he hoped that his money would be used “in an effort to more widely publicize the challenge Fox News poses to civil and informed discourse in our democracy.”

For years, conservatives have accused Media Matters of being a front organization for Mr. Soros. In May, Mr. Beck referred to Media Matters as “the left-wing George Soros-funded media machine that is now referring to me as a jihadist.” In 2007, Fox’s Sean Hannity called it “Hillary Clinton’s George Soros-funded group Media Matters.”

Officials at Media Matters regularly deny that they have ever taken money from Mr. Soros, who repeats that denial in Wednesday’s statement, saying, “I have not to date been a funder” of the liberal organization.

Who would have thought the right-wingers we count on to give us accurate information about George Soros have been lying all this time?

If you pay any attention to conservative media, you're probably aware that Beck and Hannity have been far from alone in their assertions on this matter. But let's just note a few examples, for the record.

  • On 30 October 2006, the self-described "#1 Keith Olbermann blog in the world," whimpered, "Ultra-left, Soros-funded, Media Matters for America is attacking Olbermann Watch …"

  • On his 16 April 2007 radio show, Rush Limbaugh asserted that Media Matters received funding from Soros. After calling them "Stalinist" and before saying he was "not demeaning people on this program in any way."

  • From a 6 May 2007 News Day article re-posted on FreeRepublic: "On April 24, [Fox News host Bill] O’Reilly told viewers of 'The O’Reilly Factor' that Soros and several other wealthy radicals were helping to fund Media Matters …"

  • Also in April 2007 (coincidence?), Macsmind fired off a screed, beginning with an authoritative blockquote that amounted to "someone said Matt Drudge said." He moved from there to quote at length from a "report" from CNS, a Brent Bozell outfit, which itemized categorical denials by Media Matters that they had ever received money from Soros and concluded that this proved of course they were taking money from Soros. Macsmind then quotes David Horowitz, also to the effect of "no evidence whatsoever is proof that Soros hid his tracks well." Macsmind concludes, "So as it is with liberals it all depends on what you mean by 'funded'." He also has this line in quotes in his post title, as though someone else said it. Perhaps he has a multiple personality disorder? At any rate, connoisseurs will enjoy reading the whole thing.

  • Capital Research Center, an outfit run by ex-Reaganites and ex-Heritage Foundation employees, led off its July 2007 newsletter with the headline, "Media Matters for America: Soros-Funded Watchdog Attacks Conservatives."

  • On 6 October 2007, writing on the world's most inaccurately named website, Rick Moran referred to a 2004 National Review piece by Byron York, republished by NRO in 2007, in which York, a master of plausible deniability, made up for his dearth of evidence by dropping enough guilt-by-association hints for the Morans of the world to connect the dots. Moran seems to have been helped in this by Fox News's John Gibson, who among other mentions on 4 October 2007 said on the air, "I've talked about Brock and Media Matters getting Soros' support …" (Two days earlier, Gibson had said: "Here are the facts: Media Matters was started in offices provided by the Center for American Progress, a Soros-funded operation. It has since received Soros money. Facts, not lies.") Another of the misnamed horde followed up a day after Moran, referring to "Media Matters, a Soros-funded front group."

  • On 13 January 2008, after Patterico had pontificated about Soros, M. Scott Eiland harrumphed, "And has no problems with donating heavily to organizations run by self-confessed liars for hire (cough cough Media Matters cough cough)." (Okay, that was nutpicking, but once I Googled his name, how could I not? (Related.))

  • On 13 February 2008, Debbie Schlussel wrote, "I gotta love the Media Matters people, funded by George Soros, the former Jew …" In the post title, she chose a different way to follow the money: "Nazi-Funded Media Matters."

  • On 30 March 2009, Canada Free Press (slogan: "...Because without America there is no Free World; about: "Espousing Conservative viewpoints, cornerstone of which contain love of God, love of family, love of country …" (specific country not given)) went the Byron York route: "Media Matters for America, the George Soros-funded* organization …" Do what their readers wouldn't, and look for the other asterisk to enjoy the ass-covering disclaimers.

  • Another National Review employee, Mark Steyn, on 9 April 2010: "By the way, I understood Media Matters to be a George Soros-funded website." It's not clear why he chose the past tense, since he did not go on to say, for example, that he no longer believed that. He did complain about "[t]he Media Matters guy who used to to transcribe my 'lame jokes' from The Rush Limbaugh Show," and then went on to make another … well, you be the judge: "Which NRO Professor Emeritus of Racism and Homophobia do I have to kiss up to to get a little tenured credentialization around here?"

  • On 19 May 2010, Ben Domenech, back with the RedState Trike Force for some reason, began a post, "I find the George Soros-funded Media Matters for America outlet extremely entertaining …" There is no reason to believe he did not come up with that lede himself, amirite?

  • Joseph A. Klein, a columnist for David Horowitz's Frontpage magazine and author of the book Global Deception: The UN's Stealth Assault on America's Freedom, led off a 27 August 2010 blog piece with the phrase "Media Matters, the George Soros-funded attack machine …"

  • On 7 October 2010, radio host Mark Levin, yelling about Media Matters as a "criminal front group" on his Facebook page, began with this: "Who funds Media Matters? Well, we know the loathsome George Soros was Media Matters' sugar daddy." Denizen of his echo chamber Jeffrey Lord ran with it: "Media Matters, the left-wing media organization ginned up by George Soros and currently keeping its donors a secret …

In conclusion, thanks to George Soros, wingnuts can now claim to have been telling the truth all along!




By the way, the main point of that piece by Terkel (h/t: @Wolfrum) is a report that Angelo Carusone has been hired by Media Matters. Congratulations to him and them. Carusone is the founder of StopBeck, and has spearheaded an effort to get companies to stop sponsoring Glenn Beck's show. So far, over three hundred companies have agreed that this is a good thing to do.

StopBeck home page banner

(bullet pic. source)

How To Win in Afghanistan, Instantly

One look at the "hairstyle" and the al Qaedas and Talibans would die laughing.

You have to love the comedy at the site, right from the beginning:

The Draft Trump 2012 committee is an independent grass-roots citizen's efforts to make Donald Trump President. We are neither funded nor directed by Donald Trump but we are encouraged by his public indications that he is seriously considering the race.

Uh huh. Just like those conservative Grassroots™ activists in Wisconsin.

(h/t: StrangeAppar8us, Hunger Tallest Palin)

Sunday, February 13, 2011

Anonleaks is coming!

So the good people from Anonymous say:

A rare .ru link that we can feel safe in clicking: anonleaks.ru.

Some details from Adrian Chen at Gawker.

The sudden new importance of Anonymous discussed on this blog starting here.

(h/t: @on_the_media)

Eye Candy: The Classic Edition

Uncle Eb advises, over at Blogpocalypse, that Art Project is now live.

Their blurb:

Explore museums from around the world, discover and view hundreds of artworks at incredible zoom levels, and even create and share your own collection of masterpieces.

Yes, this is Google, being evil once again. Seems as though it's just getting going (or so one hopes), but you can already see a bunch of work from various famous museums and do a sort of walk-through of these museums. If you've used Street View in Google Maps, it will feel familiar.

(I've just started looking around.)

[Added] Google's plain-text intro/guide to the project.

Marathon, Man

Uh ...

Politifact: "Fact-checking CPAC."

This has the smell of a task created to get someone fired for Not Fulfilling Responsibilities, but maybe it'll be fleshed out at some point.

So far, they have one bit of truthiness and one outright FALSE from Willard "Mittens" Romney. And this:

We'll update this story with additional fact-checks as we publish them.

Godspeed to you, Louis Jacobson.

Saturday, February 12, 2011

Somehow, I don't think wingnuts will be blogging about "Chicago-style thuggery" this time

Remember that story about HBGary, the "security" firm that got pwned by Anonymous? Was worth it for the lulz at the time, but now it also looks like some disturbing information is coming to light as a consequence.

JAB calls attention ("You have to get up pretty early in the morning to make the Mafia look like pikers…") to a ThinkProgress post, which begins as follows:

Earlier today, ThinkProgress published an exclusive report that the law firm representing the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, a right-wing trade association representing big business, is working with set of “private security” companies and lobbying firms to undermine their political opponents, including ThinkProgress. According to e-mails obtained by ThinkProgress, the Chamber hired the lobbying firm Hunton and Williams. Attorneys for the firm solicited a set of private security firms — HBGary Federal, Palantir, and Berico Technologies (collectively called Team Themis) — to develop a sabotage campaign against progressive groups and labor unions, including ThinkProgress, the labor coalition Change to Win, SEIU, US Chamber Watch, and StopTheChamber.com.

New emails reveal that the private spy company investigated the families and children of the Chamber’s political opponents. The apparent spearhead of this project was Aaron Barr, an executive at HBGary. Barr circulated numerous emails and documents detailing information about political opponents’ children, spouses, and personal lives.

Of course, this is not nearly as sinister as the imaginary stuff Obama does, amirite?

The quoted link, among other things, points to some work done by Marcy Wheeler. She's got copies of some of the documents related to the US Chamber of Commerce's spying plans.

The ThinkProgress posts also describe other dirty tricks and disinformation campaigns that are or were being planned, that had the intent of smearing watchdog and other progressive groups. I'd say it's worth your time to spend a few minutes reading them, and perhaps also this post from Josh Harkinson at MoJo, but then I'm a liberal, so therefore I hate America, democracy, your freedoms, &c.

[Added] Hey, look! An actually decent story with some interesting tidbits (16 year old girl! lol) from the MSM: Byron Acohido at USA Today. (Don't be put off by the headline, as I almost was.) Also, Glennzilla has a typically thorough post up, which he describes as "just the summary." The more details the better in a case like this, I say. It appears that Glenn was on the list of targets.

[Added2] I should say that I don't know for sure that ThinkProgress is relying exclusively on info from the Anonymous hack. Glennzilla's post suggests they might have had other sources.

[Added3] So far, the silence is deafening from Wingnuttia.

[Added4] Soon, the emails will be made available to all, Anonymous says.

Deep Thought

Why is there so much difference between vamping and revamping?

"Repeal, Restrict and Repress"

Charles M. Blow's column presents a good summary of what we've seen from your new Republican majority thus far, especially at the less well illuminated lower levels of power. Here's how it starts:

Republican state lawmakers, emboldened by their swollen ranks, have a message for minorities, women, immigrants and the poor: It’s on!

In the first month of the new legislative season, they have introduced a dizzying number of measures on hot-button issues in statehouses around the country as part of what amounts to a full-throttle mission to repeal, restrict and repress.

It wasn’t supposed to happen like this.

As Reuters pointed out this week, in the midterms, “Republicans gained nearly 700 state legislative seats and now have their largest numbers since the Great Depression, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.”

Judging by the lead-up to those elections, one could have easily concluded that the first order of business on Republicans’ agendas would be a laserlike focus on job creation and deficit reductions to the exclusion of all else. Not the case.

The rest.

(x-posted)

Music of the Revolution

Interesting segment from this week's On The Media.

Don't shy away if you're not the world's biggest hip hop fan. I'm not, either. I'll tell you this much, though. To the extent that Abdulla Darrat knows what he's talking about, and he sounds like he does, there's a lot of hope running through these ten minutes.


You can download the mixtape “Mish B3eed” (“Not Far”) and find links to the artists' Facebook pages on this page of Abdulla's site, Enough!Khalas.

__________


A related article appears on the website run by PRI's The World.

From that article, here's a song by Ramy Donjewan that caught my ear. (Hope I didn't condemn it, or him, to immediate uncoolness by saying that.) Google tells me the title translates as "Against the government."

Ramy Donjewan - ضد الحكومة

(alt. video link)

The advantage here is that the lyrics are printed on the screen, to make it easier to sing along.

__________


[Added] Also good: Ibn Thabit, "The Question." (More info, plus opportunity to download the MP3, here.)

(alt. video link)

If you're using the Firefox add-on Flashblock, the above might not play. Either disable it temporarily and reload this page or visit one of the above links to hear.

Oh, cool! A year-old podcast debate! About going to Mars!

This will not be for everybody, but if you're a space nerd like me, you might like it: the 10th Annual Isaac Asimov Memorial Debate, sponsored by the American Museum of Natural History, moderated by Neil deGrasse Tyson, and featuring real experts:

Answering these critical questions were Kenneth Ford of the Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, Lester Lyles (ret) of the United States Air Force, Paul Spudis of the Lunar and Planetary Institute, Steven Squyres of Cornell University, and Robert Zubrin, founder of the Mars Society. Apollo 11 astronaut Buzz Aldrin made a surprise appearance at the end of the conversation after having listened to the debate. His comments were followed by a question and answer session with audience members and reporters.

It's about two hours long, but if your tastes are like mine, you'll think it was too short. (Okay, the Q&A part at the end was a bit tedious, and they needed the hook for Aldrin after a while, but other than that.) Visit the link above to listen, or right-click and save directly on this MP3 link.

"Godwink's Law"

Well done, William K. Wolfrum!

(h/t: that podcast)

(?, ?)

Ah, now I can die happy

You're welcome, Joshua!

And everyone else!

;)

ShareThis