From Blake Stacey, via Mark Liberman:
(Apparently inspired by an irritable PZ looking at a different -- though similar in appearance -- chart that presumably was serious.)
(Previous paragraph edited for clarity. I hope.)
Sunday, June 07, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
What is PZ getting bent about? Isn't the graph *meant* to be a joke? Or does he think they are really claiming the Ray Kurweil will be a source of the information we get?
I guess I should have been clearer in my post, but as I said, PZ was reacting to a "similar picture." If you go look at PZ's post, you'll see it really is some sort of hand-wavy science-y thing. The picture Blake made that I posted was a joke, derived from the original, evidently in response to (in support of) PZ.
Updated the post. Thanks for indicating it wasn't clear.
Post a Comment